Are There Any Even Perfect Numbers Between Two Primes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter K Sengupta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    even Prime Puzzle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying even perfect numbers C where both C-1 and C+1 are prime. It suggests that 6 is a candidate, as it is the only known even perfect number that fits this criterion. Additionally, it notes that all even perfect numbers, except for 6, yield a remainder of 1 when divided by 9. The conversation raises questions about the feasibility of finding all such perfect numbers given that only 47 are currently known. The exploration of this mathematical concept highlights the rarity and uniqueness of even perfect numbers in relation to prime numbers.
K Sengupta
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
Determine all possible even perfect number(s) C such that each of C-1 and C+1 is a prime number.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is it even possible to find ALL of these such numbers when only 47 perfect numbers are known?

Anyway, I say 6. That is all :smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top