Evolution of universe with differing SOL

tasp77
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
I have seen discussions of universes with different numbers of spatial dimensions, universes without a strong arrow of time, universes with differing physical constants, etc. but I was wondering

(here it comes, you are wondering)

(LOL)

would our universe be substantially similar with a drastically different speed of light?

(and everything else the same, protons and gravity and such)

For instance, if light propagated at 550 km/second ??

Or

if light traveled at 90,000,000,000 km/second ??

And by substantially similar, would there be stars, and fusion, and planets and orbits, and galaxies ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are unit systems where the speed of light is fixed to 1. It is just a conversion factor. If you don't change anything in natural units, nothing changes. Length and time do not have fundamental scales, unless you determine them via fundamental constants which include the speed of light.
 
tasp77 said:
I have seen discussions of universes with different numbers of spatial dimensions, universes without a strong arrow of time, universes with differing physical constants, etc. but I was wondering

(here it comes, you are wondering)

(LOL)

would our universe be substantially similar with a drastically different speed of light?

(and everything else the same, protons and gravity and such)

For instance, if light propagated at 550 km/second ??

Or

if light traveled at 90,000,000,000 km/second ??

And by substantially similar, would there be stars, and fusion, and planets and orbits, and galaxies ?


I looked into this once n a simplistic way. If c is different then many fundamental constants are different, and this would definitely make a difference. It was beyond me to say what. It would take a real expert to determine the consequences, and I think they have more practical things to do.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Back
Top