Exact differential and work done

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between conservative forces and exact differentials in the context of work done. It establishes that if the infinitesimal work ๐นโƒ— โ‹…๐‘‘๐‘Ÿโƒ— is an exact differential, the work is independent of the path taken, confirming the force as conservative. The condition for ๐นโƒ— โ‹…๐‘‘๐‘Ÿโƒ— to be an exact differential in two dimensions is given by the equality ๐‘‘๐น๐‘ฅ/๐‘‘๐‘ฆ=๐‘‘๐น๐‘ฆ/๐‘‘๐‘ฅ. Examples illustrate that the work done by gravity is conservative, while the work done by friction is not, as the latter depends on the path taken.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservative and non-conservative forces
  • Knowledge of exact differentials in calculus
  • Familiarity with the concept of work in physics
  • Basic grasp of vector calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical definition and properties of exact differentials
  • Explore the implications of conservative forces in classical mechanics
  • Learn about the work-energy theorem and its applications
  • Investigate the role of path independence in various physical systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals interested in classical mechanics, particularly those focusing on force analysis and work calculations.

putongren
Messages
124
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
The work done is independent of path if the infinitesimal work ๐นโƒ— โ‹…๐‘‘๐‘Ÿโƒ—
is an exact differential.
I was researching about conservative and non-conservative forces, and there is some information in a website that sates that the work done is independent of path if the infinitesimal work ๐นโƒ— โ‹…๐‘‘๐‘Ÿโƒ— is an exact differential. It further states that in 2 dimensions the condition for ๐นโƒ— โ‹…๐‘‘๐‘Ÿโƒ— = Fxdx + Fydy to be an exact differential is:

๐‘‘๐น๐‘ฅ/๐‘‘๐‘ฆ=๐‘‘๐น๐‘ฆ/๐‘‘๐‘ฅ.

My question is this: why is a force conservative if the work is an exact differential? How can we deduce from the definition of a conservative force that this force is conservative if the work done to it is an exact differential?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
putongren said:
My question is this: why is a force conservative if the work is an exact differential?
Because if you integrate an exact differential, the result is the difference of some function evaluated at the two limits. This is what "work is independent of the path" means.

Here is an example. Suppose you use an eraser to erase a chalkboard. To do that you push the eraser against the board and, starting at the bottom B, you go to the middle M, then to the top T and then back to M. Let ##h=~##the height of the board.

The work done by the force of gravity ##mg## is
From B to M: ##~W_{BM}=-mg*\dfrac{h}{2}.##
From M to T: ##~W_{MT}=-mg*\dfrac{h}{2}.##
From T to back to M: ##~W_{TM}=+mg*\dfrac{h}{2}.##
Note that ##W_{BM}+W_{MT}+W_{TM}=W_{BM}.## This says that the total work is independent of the path because it is the same when one stops at M or goes past M to T and then back to M. We conclude that the force of gravity is conservative.

The work done by the force of friction ##f## is
From B to M: ##~W_{BM}=-f*\dfrac{h}{2}.##
From M to T: ##~W_{MT}=-f*\dfrac{h}{2}.##
From T to back to M: ##~W_{TM}=-f*\dfrac{h}{2}.##
Note that ##W_{BM}+W_{MT}+W_{TM}=3W_{BM}.## This says that the total work is not independent of the path because it is not the same when one stops at M or goes past M to T and then back to M. We conclude that the force of gravity friction is not conservative.
 
Last edited:
kuruman said:
The work done by the force of friction ##f## is
From B to M: ##~W_{BM}=-f*\dfrac{h}{2}.##
From M to T: ##~W_{MT}=-f*\dfrac{h}{2}.##
From T to back to M: ##~W_{TM}=-f*\dfrac{h}{2}.##
Note that ##W_{BM}+W_{MT}+W_{TM}=3W_{BM}.## This says that the total work is not independent of the path because it is not the same when one stops at M or goes past M to T and then back to M. We conclude that the force of *gravity* is not conservative.

I believe you meant friction. Besides that, great explanation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and kuruman
Juanda said:
I believe you meant friction. Besides that, great explanation.
Good catch, thanks. I cut and pasted from above without changing the force. I edited to fix the typo.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Juanda
Sorry, I assumed you already knew what an exact differential is.
 

Similar threads

  • ยท Replies 1 ยท
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • ยท Replies 48 ยท
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • ยท Replies 22 ยท
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • ยท Replies 1 ยท
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • ยท Replies 6 ยท
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • ยท Replies 2 ยท
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • ยท Replies 11 ยท
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • ยท Replies 42 ยท
2
Replies
42
Views
8K
  • ยท Replies 31 ยท
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • ยท Replies 9 ยท
Replies
9
Views
959