Exact Differential Equation and Green's theorem

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 7K views
abcdefg10645
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
We can use Green's theorem to understand why the Exact Differential Equation satisfy the conditions it should have ...

How about a DE for more than two variables ?

Eg.dF=P(x,y,z,w)dx+Q(x,y,z,w)dy+R(x,y,z,w)dz+S(x,y,z,w)dw

IF the equation above is an Exact Differential Equation , what condition it would satisfy ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An equation of the form f(x,y,z)dx+ g(x,y,z)dy+ h(x,y,z)dz= 0 is "exact" if and only if there exist some F(x,y,z) such that
[tex]dF= \frac{\partial F}{\p<br /> artial x}dx+ \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}dy+ \frac{\partial F}{\partial z}= f(x,y,z)dx+ g(x,y,z)dy+ h(x,y,z)dz[/tex]

That means that we must have
[tex]\frac{\partial F}{\partial x}= f(x,y,z)[/tex]
[tex]\frac{\partial F}{\partial y}= g(x,y,z)[/tex]
and
[tex]\frac{\partial F}{\partial z}= h(x,y,z)[/tex]

So, as long as those functions are continuous, we must have the "mixed partials" equal:
[tex]\frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial x\partial y}= \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}= \frac{\partial g}{\partial x}= \frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial y\partial x}[/tex]
etc.

Since you mention "Green's theorem" (for two variables) you might want to look at [itex]\nabla\times f(x,y,z)\vec{i}+ g(x,y,z)\vec{j}+ h(x,y,z)\vec{k}[/itex] and Stoke's theorem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What u mentioned contains three variables ~and I've seen such a case in the book I read...

Suppose [tex]\vec{F}[/tex]=P(x,y,z)[tex]\hat{i}[/tex]+Q(x,y,z)[tex]\hat{j}[/tex]+R(x,y,z)[tex]\hat{k}[/tex]

dT=P(x,y,z)dx+Q(x,y,z)dy+R(x,y,z)dz is exact if only if [tex]\vec{F}[/tex][tex]\bullet[/tex]([tex]\nabla[/tex][tex]\times[/tex][tex]\vec{F}[/tex])=0

I'm now requesting for the case which contains more than three variables~


HallsofIvy said:
An equation of the form f(x,y,z)dx+ g(x,y,z)dy+ h(x,y,z)dz= 0 is "exact" if and only if there exist some F(x,y,z) such that
[itex]dF= \frac{\partial F}{\partial x}dx+ \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}dy+ \frac{\partial F}{\partial z}= f(x,y,z)dx+ g(x,y,z)dy+ h(x,y,z)dz[/itex]

That means that we must have
[tex]\frac{\partial F}{\partial x}= f(x,y,z)[/tex]
[tex]\frac{\partial F}{\partial y}= g(x,y,z)[/tex]
and
[tex]\frac{\partial F}{\partial z}= h(x,y,z)[/tex]

So, as long as those functions are continuous, we must have the "mixed partials" equal:
[tex]\frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial x\partial y}= \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}= \frac{\partial g}{\partial x}= \frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial y\partial x}[/tex]
etc.

Since you mention "Green's theorem" (for two variables) you might want to look at [itex]\nabla\times f(x,y,z)\vec{i}+ g(x,y,z)\vec{j}+ h(x,y,z)\vec{k}[/itex] and Stoke's theorem.