Exam review, How did he find the size of AxA?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr_coffee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam Review
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the number of binary relations on a set S, specifically when S has a size of 3. It establishes that the size of the Cartesian product S x S is 9, leading to the conclusion that the number of binary relations is 2^9, resulting in 512. Additionally, it addresses the calculation of the size of the Cartesian product A x A, where A = {2, 3, 5}, confirming that the size is 9 through the multiplication of the number of elements in A (3) by itself. The discussion also touches on the fundamental principle of counting for determining the size of A x B, where A has 3 elements and B has 4, yielding 12 elements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cartesian products in set theory
  • Knowledge of power sets and their properties
  • Familiarity with binary relations and their definitions
  • Basic principles of counting in combinatorics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of power sets in set theory
  • Learn about binary relations and their applications
  • Explore the fundamental principle of counting in combinatorics
  • Investigate Cartesian products and their significance in mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying set theory and combinatorics, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts related to binary relations and Cartesian products.

mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone, another review question I'm lost on,

He has the following question
A binary relation on a set S is defined to be any subset of the Cartesian product S x S. (We will study binary rleations later in the course.) If S is a set of size 3, how many binary relations are there on the set S?

We never went over what a binary relation is, so we must not need it for this question.

But if the size of S = 3, then size of SxS = 9 right?

And if he told us a binary relation on a set S is deifned to be any subset of SxS then he must mean take the power set of (SxS). I know the size of a power set is defined as 2^n, where n is the number of elements. So I would get

2^9 = 512 which is the correct answer.
( I just got this while typing the question out)

But now this brings up another question...

Let A = {2, 3, 5} and B = {3,4,5,6}
If A has 3 elements and B has 4, is there a fast way to figure out the size of AXA or do you have to write out and just count the elements? the answer is 9. So could i have just said well there are 3 elements in A, so 3x3 = 9. Or if i had AXB would that just be 3x4 = 12 elements
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well it's the very essence of multiplication. In the probability book my class uses this is called the "fundamental principle of counting". If there are n ways to pick an element from A and for each of them, there are m ways to pick an element from B, then there are nxm ways to form a pair of 1 element from A and one element from B.
 
ahh thanks for the info!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
21K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K