Examine the continuity of this absolute value function

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the continuity of the function y = (1 - |x|) / |1 - x|, particularly for x < 0. The user initially misapplied the absolute value properties, leading to an incorrect expression for y. Clarification was provided that for x < 0, |1 - x| simplifies to 1 - x without a negative sign in the denominator. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting absolute values in different cases to avoid errors in calculations. Understanding these properties is crucial for accurately determining the function's behavior.
needingtoknow
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



y = 1-abs(x) / abs(1-x)

The Attempt at a Solution



For x < 0, abs(x) = -x

y = (1+x) / -(1-x)
= -(1+x)/(1-x)

I stopped here because this is the part I got wrong. For x < 0, my solutions manual got (1+x) / (1-x).
What did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
needingtoknow said:

Homework Statement



y = 1-abs(x) / abs(1-x)

The Attempt at a Solution



For x < 0, abs(x) = -x

y = (1+x) / -(1-x)
= -(1+x)/(1-x)

I stopped here because this is the part I got wrong. For x < 0, my solutions manual got (1+x) / (1-x).
What did I do wrong?

For ##x<0##, ##-x>0## so ##1-x>0## so ##|1-x|=1-x##. No minus sign needed in the denominator.
 
needingtoknow said:

Homework Statement



y = 1-abs(x) / abs(1-x)

The Attempt at a Solution



For x < 0, abs(x) = -x

y = (1+x) / -(1-x)
= -(1+x)/(1-x)

I stopped here because this is the part I got wrong. For x < 0, my solutions manual got (1+x) / (1-x).
What did I do wrong?

For your written function
y = 1 - \frac{|x|}{|1-x|}
you have ##y = 1 + x/(1-x) = 1/(1-x) ## for ##x < 0##.

On the other hand, if you really meant something different from what you wrote, namely,
y = \frac{1-|x|}{|1-x|}
then you would have ##y = (1+x)/(1-x) ## for ##x < 0##. Which function do you mean? Us parentheses for clarity, like this: y = (1-|x|)/|1-x|, or y = (1-abs(x))/ abs(1-x) if your keyboard does not have an "|" key.
 
It was the second one: y = (1-|x|)/|1-x|. So how did you get y=(1+x)/(1−x) for x<0?
 
needingtoknow said:
It was the second one: y = (1-|x|)/|1-x|. So how did you get y=(1+x)/(1−x) for x<0?

Didn't you read post #2?
 
Sorry I should have addressed your reply as well. So LCKurtz let me start off by saying what I understand from your reply.

"For x<0, −x>0 so 1−x>0 so |1−x|=1−x. No minus sign needed in the denominator."

Since -x > 0 can be written as x < 0, therefore -(1-x) > 0 can also be written as 1-x < 0. If this is true then can't this apply to any time we need to consider the negative case for an absolute value function. For the numerator, why can't this same logic apply?
 
needingtoknow said:
Sorry I should have addressed your reply as well. So LCKurtz let me start off by saying what I understand from your reply.



Since -x > 0 can be written as x < 0, therefore -(1-x) > 0 can also be written as 1-x < 0. If this is true then can't this apply to any time we need to consider the negative case for an absolute value function. For the numerator, why can't this same logic apply?

Have you forgotten that -(-x) = x and that for x < 0 we have |x| = -x?
 
LCKurtz said:
For ##x<0##, ##-x>0## so ##1-x>0## so ##|1-x|=1-x##. No minus sign needed in the denominator.

needingtoknow said:
Sorry I should have addressed your reply as well. So LCKurtz let me start off by saying what I understand from your reply.



Since -x > 0 can be written as x < 0, therefore -(1-x) > 0 can also be written as 1-x < 0. If this is true then can't this apply to any time we need to consider the negative case for an absolute value function. For the numerator, why can't this same logic apply?

I can't make any sense out of that reply. Why don't you just follow the steps I gave you? You start with ##x<0##. Multiply both sides by ##-1## so ##-x>0##. Since ##-x## is positive, adding ##1## to it is still positive, so ##1-x > 0##. The absolute value of a positive number is the number itself so ##|1-x| = 1-x##. You don't get ##-(1-x)##.
 
My mind must have been somewhere else when I was reading your first reply. It makes crystal clear sense. Thank you for your time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K