Example & Question: What Will Clock 3 Count?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ghost11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example
ghost11
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi guys
is the example true?
what will the clock 3 count when the light reach it

new17p.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF! Move towards the light!

Hi ghost11! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Yes, the diagrams are correct …

the lamp and the clocks are stationary, and the plane is going half as fast as the light, so in the clocks' frame (middle diagram), the plane will reach the first clock at the same time as the light reaches the second clock.

And in the plane's frame (bottom diagram), a ray of light is moving left, and the clocks are moving right, half as fast as the light …

(and of course they're closer together, but that won't make any difference)

so when the first clock reaches the plane, the third clock will have moved towards the light.
ghost11 said:
what will the clock 3 count when the light reach it

You do the maths (no square-roots needed! :wink:) …

what equations do you get?

Hint: move towards the light, ghost11! :smile:
 
thank you tiny-tim
in the second and third diagram the clocks count 1 second!
in the second diagram it will take 1.5 second for the light to reach clock 3
in the third diagram it will take 1 second for the light to reach clock 3
what the clock will count for real??
please explane more ... cause iam little slow .. o:)
 
Clock 3 will show 1.5s when the light reaches it. The third diagram is a bit confusing. It shouldn't say "clocks 1s". It should say that the clock on the plane shows 1s. Also, it shouldn't say that the plane's speed is c/2. It should say that the speed of the light bulb and the clocks in the picture is c/2.
 
Fredrik thank you a lot
I didn't see it that way ... i understand now
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Back
Top