Is energy transfer in a chemical reaction always from potential to kinetic?

AI Thread Summary
Energy transfer in chemical reactions involves the concepts of endothermic and exothermic processes, where endothermic reactions absorb energy and exothermic reactions release it. Breaking chemical bonds requires energy, while forming bonds releases energy due to the stabilization of lower energy states. In exothermic reactions, the products have stronger bonds and lower energy than the reactants, whereas the opposite is true for endothermic reactions. The discussion highlights that energy can be transferred as heat, and the terms 'endothermic' and 'exothermic' relate to changes in enthalpy, which is a more complex concept involving internal energy, pressure, and volume. Understanding these principles clarifies the relationship between potential and kinetic energy in chemical reactions.
Werg22
Messages
1,431
Reaction score
1
Endothermic / Exothermic

I have to say that I am a little at loss here. I understand that an endothermic process absorbs more energy than it releases, and that an exothermic process is the opposite. However, I don't understand the implications in terms of kinetic and potential energy. Here is what I have seized so far:

- Breaking bonds requires energy (This is understandable)
- Forming bonds releases energy (Why?)
- In an exothermic reaction, the bonds of the products are stronger than those of the reactants.
- In a endothermic reaction, it is the opposite.

Now how exactly is energy transferred from potential to kinetic? If in a reaction, the temperature rises, is it endothermic or exothermic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electrons form the bonds, and if the temperature in a reaction is increasing does that correspond to an increase in heat (release) or a decrease in heat (consumption)?
 
Ok. But how is heat consumed exactly? When bonds get stronger, kinetic energy is transferred to atoms? I don't really get the logic, since if bonds get stronger, the more restraint atoms and thus would have less kinetic energy...
 
Sounds like a lot of hand waving unless you have studied the quantum mechanics of the chemical bond (covalent).

Heat is added to a reaction to overcome the activation energy, the lower the activation energy the more rapid the reaction, the higher the activation energy, the more slowly the reaction.
 
- Forming bonds releases energy (Why?)

Forming Bonds releases energy because bond formation is a stablizing process. Something is said to be more stable with respect to something else if the former has lower energy than the later. Everything in nature has to tendency to attain stability by lowering its energy this is done simply by releasing energy in some form (Heat or EM waves for instance).

- In an exothermic reaction, the bonds of the products are stronger than those of the reactants.

As discussed above the more stronger the bond, lower is its energy. Since energy is released in an exothermic process the energy of the reactants must be greater than the products (This difference is what that is released) or in other words the product is more stable than reactants which in turn means that product must be having stronger bonds than reacants

- In a endothermic reaction, it is the opposite.

Just the opposite of my previous answer.. :-)

Now how exactly is energy transferred from potential to kinetic? If in a reaction, the temperature rises, is it endothermic or exothermic?

Atoms in a molecule are in the nuclear force field of other atoms, as such work has to be done by external agent in order to move atoms against the field and work is given to external agent when we move it closer. in this respect all atoms have some amount of energy due to the position it has with respect to other atoms. if we have to change the position some energy change has to occur, this happens in the form of work which in turn changes the state of motion of atoms (or kinetic energy).
 
Werg22 said:
I have to say that I am a little at loss here. I understand that an endothermic process absorbs more energy than it releases, and that an exothermic process is the opposite. However, I don't understand the implications in terms of kinetic and potential energy. Here is what I have seized so far:

- Breaking bonds requires energy (This is understandable)
- Forming bonds releases energy (Why?)
- In an exothermic reaction, the bonds of the products are stronger than those of the reactants.
- In a endothermic reaction, it is the opposite.

Now how exactly is energy transferred from potential to kinetic? If in a reaction, the temperature rises, is it endothermic or exothermic?

Energy can be transferred as heat. The terms 'endothermic' and 'exothermic' pertain to changes in enthalpy, and enthalpy is defined as H=U+PV, where U is the internal energy, P is the pressure, and V is the volume. Heat and temperature and not equivalent to enthalpy. In actuality, the enthalpy concept is a bit complicating, it entails the steps that are required to create the system from a preliminary "standard" state.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top