Expanding Universe: Mass or Space-Time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Moore1879
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of the universe's expansion, questioning whether it involves the spreading out of mass or the stretching of space-time. It is clarified that space-time itself is indeed stretching, which aligns with the cosmological principle of homogeneity and isotropy. The standard General Relativity model suggests that as time progresses, the hyper-surface of events expands, leading to mass becoming more spread out. Additionally, there is speculation about the evolution of black holes and their relationship to entropy and the concept of a multiverse, suggesting a continuous process without a definitive beginning or end. This exploration highlights the complexities of understanding cosmic phenomena and the implications for the nature of reality.
Moore1879
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Okay, I understand that the universe is expanding. I also understand that in 1998 Cosmologist discovered that the Universe is accelerating rather than decelerating. My question is: "By expanding, do they mean that the mass in the universe is becoming more spread out, or is space time actually stretching out?" The idea that space-time itself is stretching out doesn't seem right to me. I'm just wondering.

Thank You
 
Space news on Phys.org
Space. not space-time is expanding with time within space-time. You have to foliate (slice) space-time into hyper-surfaces of space each separated by a time duration.

You need a special frame of reference to make that foliation and such is provided by the cosmological principle of homogeneity and isotropy.

In one special frame of reference, the one co-moving with the cosmological representative fluid, a homogeneous universe will look isotropic.

In the standard GR model, as time progresses, that hyper-surface of events 'simultanteous' with the observer, expands.

This means as you say,
the mass in the universe is becoming more spread out.

I hope this helps,

Garth
 
I suppose that in a hole, with a event horizon beeing constant (for a very long while), there is/was a kind of singularity which is expanding as far as we can observe (in our observable universe).
Starting at some time the singularity changed from radiation behaved to baryon behaved. In the mean time our hole is changing from a white hole into a black hole. In this hole, specialness from high to low, Blackhole are forming en clustering, entropy is going from low to high. Entropy will reach a value dictated by the Bekenstein-Hawking formula Sbh=A/4 . (Planck units 10^123). (see Penrose book "The road to reality"). That will not be the end of the story because black holes will evaporate in the spacetime of a multiverse. I suppose that in a multiverse a kind of concentrated radiation singularities will form serving as new bigbangs. (In such formation process entropy goes down). This way of thinking makes it possible for me see reality as a autonomous process without creation, begin or end. Of course this is pure speculation, but creation for me is even more speculative.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top