I Relationship Between Expansion and Curvature in the Universe

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jaime Rudas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curvature Expansion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between the expansion of a spatially flat universe and the curvature of its spacetime, referencing @Orodruin's assertion that such a universe generally has curvature. It questions whether the expansion or contraction is a manifestation of this curvature and how it relates to positive or negative curvature. The scale factor's behavior is linked to the universe's energy content, which interacts with geometry through Einstein’s field equations, leading to the Friedmann equations. Curvature is described by a rank 4 tensor, although in homogeneous and isotropic cases, it can be simplified to a single curvature invariant. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complex interplay between expansion, curvature, and the underlying geometry of the universe.
Jaime Rudas
Messages
295
Reaction score
129
TL;DR Summary
Is expansion a manifestation of curvature?
Orodruin said in another thread that "the spacetime of a spatially flat universe generally has curvature".

Is the expansion (or contraction) of a spatially flat universe the manifestation of the curvature of its spacetime?

If so, does the expansion correspond to a positive or negative curvature?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The behaviour of the scale factor is dependent on the energy content of the universe, which couples to the geometry through Einstein’s field equations. This contains the curvature through the appearance of the Einstein tensor. This is what results in the Friedmann equations.
 
  • Like
Likes Jaime Rudas
Also note that curvature in general is described by a rank 4 tensor and not a single number. In the case of the homogeneous and isotropic spatial slices, the information can be boiled down to a single curvature invariant, but this is not generally the case.

Jaime Rudas said:
Orodruin said in another thread that "the spacetime of a spatially flat universe generally has curvature".
Also, please use the mention feature if you refer to other users. Preceed the user name by an @ like this: @Jaime Rudas
In cases such as this you may also consider using the quote feature, where you can add quotes from several threads and then insert them into your post.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy and Jaime Rudas
Orodruin said:
using the quote feature, where you can add quotes from several threads and then insert them into your post.

Wow, finally after all these years I know what it's for 😆 Thanks.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top