Expansion of Universe, do we know the equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter magnetoman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Universe
AI Thread Summary
The universe's expansion, primarily driven by dark energy, exhibits an exponential character in a dark energy-dominated scenario. Unlike normal matter, the density of dark energy remains constant as the universe expands, meaning it will eventually dominate the universe's composition. The Friedmann equations describe the mathematical evolution of the universe, with specific equations available for calculating current expansion rates. A notable approximation for the present value of dark energy is that it constitutes 73% of the total density, leading to a specific formula for expansion. Overall, dark energy's consistent density plays a crucial role in the universe's accelerating expansion.
magnetoman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Our acceleration universe due to 'dark energy'. Do we have a mathematical equation to describe this? I want to know if it is linear, exponential, asymptotic or something else. Is amount of 'dark energy' increasing or staying the same?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to PF!

The expansion of the universe, in a universe completely dominated by dark energy alone, is exponential in character. Since our universe is not 100% dark energy, our real universal expansion is slightly more complicated.

Now, the density of dark energy does not dilute as the volume of the universe increase. Think of a box with a finite number of particles in it, say N. Now if I expand the box, the density of particles, N/V, decreases. This does not happen with dark energy. As the volume of the box increases, density stays constant. So while the density of normal matter is falling as our universe expands, the density of dark energy is constant! This means that eventually dark energy will be the main component of the universe, simply because while everything else is decreasing it stays the same.

P.S: The mathematical equations describing the evolution of the universe are known as the Friedmann equations:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedmann_equations
 
magnetoman said:
Our acceleration universe due to 'dark energy'. Do we have a mathematical equation to describe this? I want to know if it is linear, exponential, asymptotic or something else. Is amount of 'dark energy' increasing or staying the same?

I don't know if this thread would be of any help.
There is a specific equation in post #5 that is used in the Ned Wright cosmic calculator.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=267808
 
If we take the present value of dark energy being 73% of the total density, then a/a0 = .715[sinh(1.28t/t0)]2/3. This is a pretty good approximation that ignores only "light" energy (photons, neutrinos), which is less than 1% now and is decreasing. The subscribt "0" represents the present.
(This is the LCDM model.)
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?

Similar threads

Back
Top