Expectation value using ladder operators

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the expectation value <\widehat{x}^{2}> for the ground state of a simple harmonic oscillator using ladder operators. The relation \widehat{x}^{2} = \frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}(\widehat{A}^{2} + (\widehat{A}^{+})^{2} + \widehat{A}^{+}\widehat{A} + \widehat{A}\widehat{A}^{+}) is utilized, leading to the conclusion that <\widehat{x}^{2}> = \frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}. The number operator \widehat{A}^{+}\widehat{A} is confirmed to equal zero for the ground state, validating the calculations presented.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts, specifically harmonic oscillators.
  • Familiarity with ladder operators and their properties.
  • Knowledge of expectation values in quantum mechanics.
  • Proficiency in integral calculus as applied to quantum wave functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the ladder operator method in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of the number operator in quantum harmonic oscillators.
  • Learn about the orthonormal properties of quantum states and their applications.
  • Investigate the role of expectation values in quantum mechanics and their physical interpretations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and harmonic oscillators, as well as educators seeking to clarify the application of ladder operators in expectation value calculations.

T-7
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
I wonder if someone could examine my argument for the following problem.

Homework Statement



Using the relation

[tex]\widehat{x}^{2} = \frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}(\widehat{A}^{2} + (\widehat{A}^{+})^{2} + \widehat{A}^{+}\widehat{A} + \widehat{A}\widehat{A}^{+} )[/tex]

and properties of the ladder operators, determine the expectation value [tex]<\widehat{x}^{2}>[/tex] for the ground state of the simple harmonic well.

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]<\widehat{x}^{2}> = \frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}u_{0}^{*}(\widehat{A}^{2} + (\widehat{A}^{+})^{2} + \widehat{A}^{+}\widehat{A} + \widehat{A}\widehat{A}^{+} )u_{0}.dx[/tex]

I then argue

[tex] \left[ \widehat{A},\widehat{A}^{+}\right] = \widehat{A}\widehat{A}^{+} - \widehat{A}^{+}\widehat{A} = 1[/tex]
[tex] \Rightarrow \widehat{A}\widehat{A}^{+} = 1 + \widehat{A}^{+}\widehat{A}<br /> \Rightarrow \widehat{A}^{2} + (\widehat{A}^{+})^{2} + \widehat{A}^{+}\widehat{A} + \widehat{A}\widehat{A}^{+} = \widehat{A}^{2} + (\widehat{A}^{+})^{2} + 2\widehat{A}^{+}\widehat{A} + 1 = \widehat{A}^{2} + (\widehat{A}^{+})^{2} + 2n + 1 = \widehat{A}^{2} + (\widehat{A}^{+})^{2} + 1[/tex]

I am not quite clear if it is right that [tex]\widehat{A}^{+}\widehat{A}[/tex] is equal to n (the eigenfunction number), which is zero here. Could someone comment on that, and on whether or not my treatment above is ok?

Well, if this is true, then

[tex]<\widehat{x}^{2}> = \frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}u_{0}^{*}( \widehat{A}^{2} + (\widehat{A}^{+})^{2} + 1)u_{0}.dx[/tex]

and by exploiting the orthonormal properties, I argue that the first two integrals are zero (you have one eigenfunction multiplied by another and integrated over infinity), but the third integral is 1, and then

[tex]<\widehat{x}^{2}> = \frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}[/tex]

Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]A^\dagger A[/tex] is indeed the number operator, as
[tex]A^\dagger A |n> = A^\dagger \sqrt{n} |n-1> = n |n>[/tex]


------
Assaf
http://www.physicallyincorrect.com/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K