Expectation values and commutation relations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the expectation value of the operator ##\hat{P}^3## for a harmonic oscillator in an energy eigenstate ##|n\rangle##. The problem is situated within the context of quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on operators and their properties in relation to expectation values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the operator ##\hat{P}^3## using ladder operators and questions whether there are further simplifications possible. Some participants suggest discarding terms that yield zero expectation values based on the properties of ladder operators.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, discussing the implications of orthonormality in quantum states and the behavior of ladder operators. There is a recognition that certain terms will lead to zero expectation values, and some guidance has been provided regarding the approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing exploration of Dirac notation and its advantages, indicating that participants are still familiarizing themselves with the formalism involved in quantum mechanics.

BOAS
Messages
546
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement


I am trying to calculate the expectation value of ##\hat{P}^3## for the harmonic oscillator in energy eigenstate ##|n\rangle##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
##\hat{P}^3 = (i \sqrt{\frac{\hbar \omega m}{2}} (\hat{a}^\dagger - \hat{a}))^3 = -i(\frac{\hbar \omega m}{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}(\hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger + \hat{a} \hat{a}\hat{a}^\dagger - \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger - \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger - \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} - \hat{a} \hat{a} \hat{a} + \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} + \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} \hat{a})##

I have used the trick of adding a zero such that ##\hat{a} \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger = \hat{a} \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger - \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} + \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} = \hat{a} [\hat{a}, \hat{a}^\dagger] + \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} = \hat{a} + \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}## on the terms ##\hat a \hat a \hat{a}^\dagger, \hat a \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger, \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger \hat a, \hat{a}^\dagger \hat a \hat a## and ended up with the expression (dropping the prefactors)

##\hat P^3 \propto (\hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger + 3 \hat a \hat{a}^\dagger \hat a - 3 \hat{a}^\dagger \hat a \hat{a}^\dagger + \hat a \hat a \hat a)##

which I don't think can be simplified further using the trick above. Are there any tricks I can use to tackle the central and outside terms?

Although it looks like the expectation value of all that will be zero due to the orthonormality of states...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't look for tricks. Start with the expanded 8-term expression you have and throw out the operators that you know give zero expectation values. Remember that these are also known as ladder operators. What is the result when they operate on | n >?
 
Last edited:
kuruman said:
Don't look for tricks. Start with the expanded 8-term expression you have and throw out the operators that you know give zero expectation values. Remember that these are also known as ladder operators. What is the result when they operate on | n >?

##\hat a |n\rangle = \sqrt{n} |n-1\rangle##

##\hat a \hat a |n\rangle = \sqrt{n} \hat a |n-1\rangle = \sqrt{n} \sqrt{n-1} |n-2\rangle##

##\hat a \hat a \hat a |n\rangle = \sqrt{n} \sqrt{n-1} \sqrt{n-2} |n-3\rangle##

##\langle n| \hat a \hat a \hat a |n\rangle = \sqrt{n} \sqrt{n-1} \sqrt{n-2} \langle n|n-3\rangle = 0## due to the orthonormality of states.

I think all of the others go to zero as well, since all the combinations involve uneven numbers of the creation and annihilation operators, which leads to the scalar product of a state with a different state, all of which are orthonormal.
 
BOAS said:
I think all of the others go to zero as well, since all the combinations involve uneven numbers of the creation and annihilation operators, which leads to the scalar product of a state with a different state, all of which are orthonormal.
You got it. :smile:
 
kuruman said:
You got it. :smile:

awesome, thanks for your help.

I'm still getting to grips with Dirac notation, but it's benefits are immediately obvious.
 
BOAS said:
I'm still getting to grips with Dirac notation, but it's benefits are immediately obvious.
Yesss. It allows you to integrate without actually doing any integrals (in some cases).
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K