Expectation values and commutation relations

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
BOAS
Messages
546
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement


I am trying to calculate the expectation value of ##\hat{P}^3## for the harmonic oscillator in energy eigenstate ##|n\rangle##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
##\hat{P}^3 = (i \sqrt{\frac{\hbar \omega m}{2}} (\hat{a}^\dagger - \hat{a}))^3 = -i(\frac{\hbar \omega m}{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}(\hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger + \hat{a} \hat{a}\hat{a}^\dagger - \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger - \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger - \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} - \hat{a} \hat{a} \hat{a} + \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} + \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} \hat{a})##

I have used the trick of adding a zero such that ##\hat{a} \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger = \hat{a} \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger - \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} + \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} = \hat{a} [\hat{a}, \hat{a}^\dagger] + \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} = \hat{a} + \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}## on the terms ##\hat a \hat a \hat{a}^\dagger, \hat a \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger, \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger \hat a, \hat{a}^\dagger \hat a \hat a## and ended up with the expression (dropping the prefactors)

##\hat P^3 \propto (\hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger + 3 \hat a \hat{a}^\dagger \hat a - 3 \hat{a}^\dagger \hat a \hat{a}^\dagger + \hat a \hat a \hat a)##

which I don't think can be simplified further using the trick above. Are there any tricks I can use to tackle the central and outside terms?

Although it looks like the expectation value of all that will be zero due to the orthonormality of states...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kuruman said:
Don't look for tricks. Start with the expanded 8-term expression you have and throw out the operators that you know give zero expectation values. Remember that these are also known as ladder operators. What is the result when they operate on | n >?

##\hat a |n\rangle = \sqrt{n} |n-1\rangle##

##\hat a \hat a |n\rangle = \sqrt{n} \hat a |n-1\rangle = \sqrt{n} \sqrt{n-1} |n-2\rangle##

##\hat a \hat a \hat a |n\rangle = \sqrt{n} \sqrt{n-1} \sqrt{n-2} |n-3\rangle##

##\langle n| \hat a \hat a \hat a |n\rangle = \sqrt{n} \sqrt{n-1} \sqrt{n-2} \langle n|n-3\rangle = 0## due to the orthonormality of states.

I think all of the others go to zero as well, since all the combinations involve uneven numbers of the creation and annihilation operators, which leads to the scalar product of a state with a different state, all of which are orthonormal.
 
kuruman said:
You got it. :smile:

awesome, thanks for your help.

I'm still getting to grips with Dirac notation, but it's benefits are immediately obvious.