Expecting the possible event of zero probability

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of probability in quantum mechanics, specifically regarding the expectation value of position in a one-dimensional potential well. Participants explore the implications of zero probability for finding a particle at specific points, the relationship between probability density and physical interpretation, and the effects of the uncertainty principle.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a potential well scenario and calculates the expectation value of position, questioning the meaning of observing a "possible" event with zero probability.
  • Another participant challenges the assumption that probability is zero for all points, arguing that it is only zero where the potential is infinite, suggesting that the wave function should be considered for the zero potential region.
  • A third participant emphasizes that probability density must be integrated over a subset to yield a non-zero probability, reiterating that a single point has zero assigned probability.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the physical interpretation of integrating over a single point, arguing that it contradicts the physical understanding of quantum mechanics.
  • Another participant clarifies that zero probability does not imply impossibility, asserting that improbable events can still be possible, and distinguishes between mathematical conclusions and physical phenomena.
  • A later reply affirms that events with zero probability are indeed possible, while also questioning the implications of localizing a particle with zero uncertainty and its relation to the potential well.
  • Participants discuss the interpretation of the probability density at a specific point, with one suggesting it represents the density of probability of position corresponding to the wave function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of zero probability, the interpretation of quantum mechanics, and the relationship between mathematical results and physical reality. There is no consensus on whether the terms expectation, possible, and probable need redefinition.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations of interpreting mathematical results in quantum mechanics, particularly regarding the integration of probability density over null sets and the implications of the uncertainty principle.

victorvmotti
Messages
152
Reaction score
5
Consider a potential well in 1 dimension defined by
$$
V(x)=
\begin{cases}
+\infty &\text{if}& x<0 \text{ and } x>L\\
0 &\text{if} &0\leq x\leq L
\end{cases}
$$

The probability to find the particle at any particular point x is zero.

$$P(\{x\}) = \int_S \rho(x)\mathrm{d}x=0 ;\forall\; x \in \mathbb{R}$$.

$$S = \{x\}$$ is a null set w.r.t. to the usual integration measure and therefore for each point the assigned probability is zero.

Let's suppose that the energy level is $$E_2$$ so the wavefunction is given by $$\psi_2(x)=(\frac {2}{L})^{\frac {1}{2}} \sin(\frac {2 \pi x}{L})=\psi_{2}^*(x)$$.

Now calculate the "expectation value" of position operator $$\hat{x}$$

$$<x>_2=<E_2|\hat{x}|E_2>=\frac{2}{L}\int_0^L\psi_{2}^*(x)x\psi_2(x)dx$$

So $$<x>_2=\frac{2}{L}\int_0^L x\sin^2(\frac {2 \pi x}{L})dx=\frac {L}{2}$$

Now you say that you "will observe, on average, the particle" at $$x=\frac {L}{2}$$

Can we say that here we indeed "expect" to measure or observe this "possible" event which has "zero" probability, i.e. occurs "almost never"?

Can we say that, respecting the uncertainty principle, if you localize the particle at any particular point, that is with zero uncertainty, then its momentum tends to infinity and thus will not be in this potential well.

Do we need to redefine our common meaning for the words, expectation, possible, and probable?

Also we see that $$\psi_2(\frac {L}{2})=0 \to |\psi_2(\frac {L}{2})|^2=0$$

But what is or how we should interpret the value of $$|\psi_2(\frac {L}{2})|^2$$

Is $$x=L/2$$ any different from other points given this particular wave function?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You based what you said on a wrong assumption. Its not that the probability for observing the particle is zero for all x. Its only zero for the places where the potential is infinite. For the zero potential region, you should find the wave function and that will give you the probability at each point.
 
\rho is a probability density and must be integrated over some subset of \mathbb R to actually gain a probability.

But $$S = \{x\}$$ is a null set w.r.t. to the usual integration measure and therefore for each point the assigned probability is zero.
 
I understand it now. But that's not how things work in QM. It just doesn't make sense physically to integrate from x to x and get zero and conclude that its impossible for the particle to be at x! I mean, it wasn't in the mind of the people who were developing QM so they didn't mean to get something from this so I think you can't get something out of it too.
Also, all things you did are mathematical. Mathematical tricks can't produce physical phenomena!
 
I didn't conclude that it is impossible to find the particle in a particular, neither mathematically nor physically. However, said, by math, that it should be assigned zero probability. That is precisely the point here, impossible here does not relate or is equivalent to improbable. In QM formalism, an event could be improbable, that is to occur almost never, yet it is a possible event. Ordinary language is, of course, not helpful here.
 
victorvmotti said:
Can we say that here we indeed "expect" to measure or observe this "possible" event which has "zero" probability, i.e. occurs "almost never"?

Yes, events with zero probability are possible events. Zero probability never implies the event is impossible. The deduction is correct only in the opposite direction; impossible event necessarily has zero probability (or is not even considered to have probability). This has nothing to do with wave functions - it is probability theory.

victorvmotti said:
Can we say that, respecting the uncertainty principle, if you localize the particle at any particular point, that is with zero uncertainty, then its momentum tends to infinity and thus will not be in this potential well.
You can say it, but a lot of people will not agree. High momentum does not mean the particle is outside potential well. For the infinite potential well, it is possible to have positive probability for any finite interval of momenta.

victorvmotti said:
Do we need to redefine our common meaning for the words, expectation, possible, and probable?
No, I do not think so.
victorvmotti said:
But what is or how we should interpret the value of $$|\psi_2(\frac {L}{2})|^2$$
Density of probability of position at ##x=L/2## corresponding to ##\psi_2##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K