Experimental Derivation of the Drag Force

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the experimental derivation of the drag force equation, specifically focusing on the relationship between mass, terminal velocity, and the drag force experienced by falling coffee filters. Participants explore how to derive the drag equation from experimental data, including the implications of their findings and the necessary conditions for their derivations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes an experiment where coffee filters of varying masses are dropped to measure their terminal velocities, noting a proportional relationship between mass and the square of terminal velocity.
  • Another participant suggests equating the gravitational force to the drag force at terminal velocity to derive the dependency on velocity squared.
  • A request for further explanation is made regarding the graphical data presented by the original poster.
  • It is noted that at terminal velocity, the forces acting on the filter must sum to zero, leading to a discussion about the implications of this balance.
  • One participant questions whether the relationship derived from the graph can be expressed as \( mg = dv^2 \) and seeks to clarify the role of the drag constant.
  • Another participant connects the graph to the standard equation of a straight line, suggesting that the slope can be used to determine the drag coefficient \( C_p \) once other variables are known.
  • A discussion arises about the definition of the drag constant \( D \), with one participant arguing that it should not be termed "general" since it depends on the area of the object.
  • Concerns are raised about the inclusion of air density in the drag force expression, with references made to established drag equations from external sources.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of the drag constant \( D \) and its dependence on area and shape. There is no consensus on the derivation of the drag force from the experimental data, and multiple interpretations of the graph and its implications are presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the assumptions made regarding the drag constant and the need for clarity on the definitions of variables involved in the drag force equation. The relationship between the drag force and the area of the object is also a point of contention.

koko122
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am trying to experimentally derive the drag equation. I have dropped coffee filters with varying masses and determined their resulting terminal velocity. I plotted the data and found that the mass of the coffee filter is proportional to the terminal velocity squared. I was now wondering how I can use this to derive the drag equation, which states: F_D = .5CpAv2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At terminal velocity the known constant gravitational force is equal to the unknown drag force; equate them and do a bit of algebra and you'll have the ##v^2## dependency. You will also have to do some measurements with a constant mass and different surface areas to trade out the dependency on area.
 
Would you be so kind to explain this a bit further. The graph I obtained is attached.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-08-30 at 7.55.41 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-08-30 at 7.55.41 PM.png
    5.2 KB · Views: 607
At terminal velocity the filter is not accelerating. So the forces acting on it must sum to zero. You know what the two forces are.
 
That's obvious but from the graph that I have provided can I derive that mg=dv^2 where d is the drag constant? Or can I show that the proportionality constant is equal to g/d somehow?

The graph shows the following:
$$ {v_{\textrm{T}}}^{2} \propto m$$
and from this I want to show that:
$$\Sigma F=mg-D{v_{\textrm{T}}}^{2}=0$$
So that the drag force can be defined as following:
$$F_{drag}=Dv^{2}$$
 
So...

mg = .5CpAv2

Your graph is for

v2 = mg/.5CpA

The standard equation for a straight line is..

y = slope*x + constant

but constant = 0

So in this case

y = v2
x = mass m

and the slope of the graph

= g/.5CpA

You know the slope.
You know the area A
You know g

That just leaves Cp.

Sorry had to edit a few typos in this post.
 
koko122 said:
That's obvious but from the graph that I have provided can I derive that mg=dv^2 where d is the drag constant? Or can I show that the proportionality constant is equal to g/d somehow?

The graph shows the following:
$$ {v_{\textrm{T}}}^{2} \propto m$$
and from this I want to show that:
$$\Sigma F=mg-D{v_{\textrm{T}}}^{2}=0$$
I don't see how that would follow using only the graph. It follows from Newton's second law, and that ∑F=0 at a constant velocity.

See C. Watters post #6. Cp is the only unknown in the expression for the slope, so it can be calculated.
 
Ya that makes sense. Would it be correct to infer from the graph that the drag force is equal to: $F_drag=Dv^2$, where D is just a general drag constant?
 
I don't think you can call D a "general" drag constant because D includes A (the area of the object). So it's specific to that size of filter cone rather than cones in general.

D = .5CpA

Had to edit for typo again.
 
  • #10
CWatters said:
I don't think you can call D a "general" drag constant because D includes A (the area of the object). So it's specific to that size of filter cone rather than cones in general.

D = .5CpA

Had to edit for typo again.
And wouldn't Cp include the density of air as well? That has to be in the drag force expression somewhere.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_(physics)#Drag_at_high_velocity
we have
F_{drag}=\frac{1}{2} \ \rho_{air} \ C_d \ v^2
where Cd is dimensionless -- and I'm pretty sure depends on the object's shape.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K