Experimenting with a Concave Mirror and a Candle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The experiment utilized a concave mirror with a focal length of 12.7 cm and a candle as the object. When the candle was positioned between the vertex and the focus, a virtual image was formed behind the mirror, with an image distance measured at approximately -6.0 cm. The calculations using the mirror equation yielded a negative focus value, indicating potential measurement errors or misinterpretations of the image distance. The discussion highlights the challenges of accurately locating a virtual image and emphasizes the importance of practice in such experiments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of concave mirrors and their properties
  • Familiarity with the mirror equation
  • Basic knowledge of virtual images and their characteristics
  • Experience with measurement techniques in optics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mirror equation in detail, focusing on its application to concave mirrors
  • Explore techniques for accurately measuring image distances in optical experiments
  • Learn about parallax and its effects on visual measurements
  • Investigate the principles of virtual image formation in concave mirrors
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on optics experiments, as well as hobbyists interested in practical applications of concave mirrors.

jnimagine
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
we used a concave mirror and a candle for an experiment
when the candle wa placed between the vertex and the focus of the mirror (f=12.7cm) a virtual image appeared behind the mirror.
We measure the image distance approximately by pointing a finger towards where the image might be and got 6.0cm (-6.0 when used in mirror equation) and the object was at 6.35cm. However, when I use the mirror equation to calculate the focus, i get a negative answer that is not even close to the actual focus 12.7cm. Do u think this is just due to human errors of not measuring the image distance accurately or is there some other factors that can account for this? OR is the image distance supposed to be almost the same as the object distance in this case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the virtual image did form at -12.7 cm according to the formula (which do work by the way!).

Locating a virtual image by parallax (or by finger as you say) can be tricky. Especially if you do not know what you are actually doing and did not had a bit of practice.

So I would think that you did not succeed too well at pointing at the correct position behind the mirror, that is you had to hold your finger two times futher backwards.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K