Explain my capacitor discharge math discrepancy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a mathematical discrepancy in calculating the discharge current from a .33uF capacitor charged to 1200V. The user explores three methods to validate the discharge current, with the first two methods yielding consistent results around 35W, while the third method, using energy calculations, suggests only 10W, raising questions about its applicability. The user highlights potential energy losses in the circuit, including those from transformers and resistors, but notes that these should not account for the significant difference in wattage results. Suggestions are made to consider energy dissipation in resistances and to perform detailed calculations for the AC circuit to clarify the discrepancies. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of energy calculations in capacitor discharge scenarios and the need for thorough analysis.
kenw232
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to cross check mathematically the mA being discharged from a .33uF capacitor which is charged to about 1200V by a circuit (see single_circuit.jpg) which is provided 37W of power to it. I do it three ways.

1) The circuit draws 35W total. 13V @ 5A = 65W. But the power supply drops the 13V to 7V to maintain the 5A so the effective wattage is 7V x 5A = 35W. I just assumed this 35W carries through the entire circuit and out T2 because energy cannot be created and destroyed and there is little to no resistance from what I can see. So the wattage coming out of the capacitor is still roughly < 35W. We should use Vavg I think, not Vpeak, so 35W / 600Vavg = 58mA.

2) Now (1) makes sense, but I was hoping there was a cross check. I noticed on a page like this:
http://cnx.org/content/m42427/latest/?collection=col11406/latest (see Example 2)
you can calculate the mA from a capacitor via it's reactance. X = 1 / (2 x Pi x freq x C). As shown there I do the same. I put the gas discharge tube on the scope and get the attachment single_circuit_scope.jpg.
X = 1 / (2 x Pi x freq x C)
X = 1 / (6.28318 x 42 x 0.00000033)
X = 11483 Ohms
720Vrms / 11483 = 0.06270A or 62mA
Great, this works. Essentially the same as (1). So (1) and (2) validate each other. This also means the wattage then is 720Vrms x .0627 = 45W. 45W is a little too high and not valid I think. After all Vrms is for AC, I have changing DC. So if we used Vavg its 600/11483 = 52mA, 52mA x 600Vavg = 31W. This makes more sense and probably also accounts for the wattage loss from stepping up the voltage @ T1. (35W - 31W = 4W loss).

3) But then I found E = (V² x C) / 2 which is used to calculate the energy per pulse from a capacitor discharge. Also conveniently calculated at:
http://www.vishay.com/resistors/pulse-energy-calculator/
E = (1200Vpeak² x 0.00000033) / 2
E = .2376 Joules per pulse
Joules per second = .2376 x frequency
Joules per second = .2376 x 42.4Hz
Joules per second = 10.07.
Joules per second is the same as watts.
Watts = 10W. This is shown easily and proven with the Vishay pulse calculator at that URL above. Or just see the attachment calc2.jpg. 10W? Why the sudden massive drop in wattage?

So this is where I am right now, I want to know why (3) is only giving me 10W. How can 1 and 2 work out, but 3 be so far off. Is (3) not an applicable formula to use in this case?

Any help in clarifying what I am doing wrong would be appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • single_circuit.jpg
    single_circuit.jpg
    12.5 KB · Views: 487
  • single_circuit_scope.jpg
    single_circuit_scope.jpg
    21 KB · Views: 488
  • calc2.jpg
    calc2.jpg
    40.5 KB · Views: 496
Engineering news on Phys.org
I must be honest and say I haven't looked in great detail at this but it could be worth pointing out that charging a capacitor via a resistor involves energy loss in the resistor. Could this be the source of your shortfall? You will be in a better position than I, to fit that spanner into your works. Hope it helps.
 
You need to keep in mind that there are losses in the transformers, the diodes, and the capacitor itself.
 
Yes, but not 25W worth (35W from #1 - 10W from #3). Specially considering 2 and 3 derive their answer straight from the waveform itself, so they only care about the wave, all loss from T1 is already accounted for there yet the wattage's turn out be completely different. Someone has to know why.
 
Integrate the energy dissipated in the resistance before you wonder where it's all gone. As I wrote before, every time you charge a capacitor through a resistor from an emf of V, the energy stored is QV/2 and the energy from the supply emf is QV. You lost half. Do some actual sums for your AC circuit and your explanation should be there.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top