Explaining Fictitious Forces in Accelerating Carts

AI Thread Summary
In an accelerating cart with a pendulum, an observer on the ground does not perceive fictitious forces acting on the pendulum. Instead, the pendulum appears to accelerate forward at a slower rate than the cart itself. This results in the pendulum's apparent backward swing from the perspective of someone inside the cart. However, from the ground-fixed frame of reference, the pendulum does not actually move backward. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding frames of reference in physics.
Luca 123
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Let's say there is a cart with a pendulum inside it. The cart then starts accelerating, while an observer on the ground remain still. I was told that the observer, standing still, would not observe any fictitious forces on the pendulum, so how does he explain the pendulum swinging backwards?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The pendulum doesn't swing backwards for him. It accelerates forwards a little slower than the cart does.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes sk1105
Luca 123 said:
I was told that the observer, standing still, would not observe any fictitious forces on the pendulum, so how does he explain the pendulum swinging backwards?
The term "observer" refers to a frame of reference. In a ground fixed coordinate system the pendulum never moves backwards.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top