Explaining I^2R=J_c/σ Relationship

  • Thread starter Thread starter lavster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equation I^2 R = J_c * (J_c/σ) and whether the two sides are equal. Participants highlight that the left side represents power in watts, while the right side represents power density in watts per cubic meter, indicating a unit mismatch. This discrepancy suggests that the equation cannot be valid as presented. The conversation emphasizes the importance of unit consistency in physics equations. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the two sides of the equation are not equal due to differing units.
lavster
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
can someone explain how these two are equal:

I^2 R = J_c \cdot \frac{J_c}{\sigma}

where I is the current, R is resistance, J_c is conduction current density, and \sigma is the conductivity.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They don't seem to be equal so there is nothing to explain.
You can just look at the units. The right hand side is power density (W/m^3) and the left hand side is just power (Watt)
 
I=[A]
R=[Ohm]
J=[A/m^2]
sigma=[1/(Ohm*m)]

you have a problem there with units :)
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top