Explanation Needed for Equation for Gravitation/Conservation of Energy equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the conservation of energy in the context of a projectile shot from Earth's surface at half the escape speed. The key equations involve kinetic and gravitational potential energy, with the correct form being the conservation equation that includes the potential energy at a radial distance r from Earth. There is confusion regarding the application of the total mechanical energy equation for satellites, which is not applicable to a projectile launched from the surface. The correct approach involves recognizing that at the peak of its motion, the projectile's kinetic energy is fully converted to potential energy. Understanding these concepts clarifies the relationship between initial speed, energy conservation, and the radial distance reached by the projectile.
auk411
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A projectile is shot directly away from Earth's surface. Neglect rotation of Earth. What multiple of Earth's radius R_e gives the radial distance a projectile reaches if its initial speed is 1/2 of the escape speed from Earth.


Homework Equations



Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf,
where K is the kinetic energy and u is the gravitational potential energy.

v0 =\sqrt{Gm/2R} ... this is the initial velocity when its initial speed is 1/2 of the escape speed.

The Attempt at a Solution



We know that energy is conserved. Then what I do is:

\frac{1}{2}mv02 - \frac{GMm}{R_e} = 0

I plug in v0 =\sqrt{Gm/2R} for v0 in the previous equation. I do not get the right answer. What is wrong with this equation?

Apparently, this is the right equation:

\frac{1}{2}mv02 - \frac{GMm}{R_e} = \frac{GMm}{r}, where r is just some radial distance from earth.

Now, I do not understand where \frac{GMm}{r} comes from.

Also, why doesn't the \frac{1}{2}mv02 - \frac{GMm}{R_e} =\frac{-GMm}{2r}, since that is what my textbook says is what the total mechanic energy is for satellites. Isn't this thing going to be become a satellite? So why couldn't I use the aforementioned equation?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Initially on the surface of the earth, the projectile has both kinetic and potential energy. Now at the peak of it's motion, the projectile has lost all its kinetic energy which has been converted totally into potential energy. That's where the GMm/r on the right hand side of the equation comes from.

For your last question, that equation is for an object which is already in orbit, not for something which is shot from the Earth into orbit. That equation enables us to find the speed at which the satellite is moving around the Earth if we know the altitude of the satellite. You wrote the equation wrongly too. Its

\frac{1}{2}mv^2-\frac{GMm}{r}=-\frac{GMm}{2r}

in which both r's are the distance of the satellite from the center of the earth.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top