Explore the Kaluza-Klein Model: Advantages & Drawbacks

  • Thread starter Thread starter paweld
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Model
paweld
Messages
253
Reaction score
0
I wonder why Klauza-Klein theory was discarded. According to the article:
"www.weylmann.com/kaluza.pdf"[/URL]
this model reproduces almost exactly the action of gravitation field coupled
to the electrodynamic field. What are the drawbacks of this theory?
At first sight it looks very promising.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well there is the whole unobserved dimension thing... :rolleyes:
 
Sure, but if the equations are correct ...
 
Nabeshin said:
Well there is the whole unobserved dimension thing... :rolleyes:
That's hardly a conflict with observation, since the Kaluza-Klein theory predicts that one dimension is "compact" (rolled up like the second dimension of the surface of a hose) just like in string theory. I suppose string theory brings up one possible answer to the OP's question--the original Kaluza-Klein theory was not a quantum theory, and so it presumably couldn't reproduce the experimentally-verified predictions of quantum electrodynamics (which differ in some cases from those of classical electromagnetism).

Here's a review paper on Kaluza-Klein theory and later quantum generalizations of the idea:

http://arxiv.org/abs/grqc/9805018
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top