Explore Wayne State's Masters in Astrophysics Program - Top 113 Physics Ranking

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmbrwlf730
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astrophysics State
AI Thread Summary
Wayne State University offers a Master's in Physics with a focus on astrophysics, but its program is considered weak due to having only two faculty members specializing in this area. The university is ranked #113 in physics by U.S. News, which reflects a broader trend where larger departments achieve higher rankings by covering multiple subfields. Smaller departments like Wayne State may excel in specific areas, such as atomic, molecular, and biomedical physics, but potential students should be aware of the department's focus and strengths. Additionally, the misconception that lower-ranked programs are easier to get into is addressed; Wayne State has a competitive acceptance rate, admitting less than 15 students from around 100 applications each year, with successful candidates typically having strong academic records and a clear interest in the department's research. Overall, students are advised to prioritize alignment with research interests over rankings when considering graduate programs.
tmbrwlf730
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
I've been looking into Wayne State University for a Masters in physics. I'm particularly interested in their astrophysics program but I don't know much about their program to really get an idea of how good it is. I know on U.S. News ranks them #113 in physics but does anyone know more about their astrophysics program? I'm looking into this school because my grades aren't stellar but I feel I could get in there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wayne state has a joint Physics and Astronomy program, so the same ranking would apply. It has only two people working on astrophysics, so the program is not strong.
 
I know that this thread is old but I was just browsing and I think that some perspective and advice might be useful to others. There are a lot of misconceptions compounded by the fascination with rankings.

Any department, not just physics, gets a high ranking by being large and doing everything. You get a ranking in every subfield and a composite based on those subfield rankings. A place like Wayne State, or any of the other hundreds of small departments, focus on just a few things and frequently do those few things quite well. U of Hawaii is not even ranked but if you want to do observational astronomy it might be a good place to go. Wayne is very heavily into atomic, molecular, materials, optics, etc., all things that are very doable in a small department, and they do those things quite well. They are essentially the birthplace of thermal wave imaging. They are into biomedical physics in conjunction with a very large medical school. So the point is that you can go to a very large department and confidently have the opportunity to do just about anything but if you are applying to a small department you should be familiar with what they do and be motivated to work in a particular field.

Do not think that US News rankings have anything to do with ease of acceptance. It is a common misconception that you should apply to a lower ranked department because you have low grades or test scores. Wayne State has a lower acceptance rate than U of Chicago. They admit less than 15 students from roughly 100 applications annually. Those students do not have low grades or test scores. In fact, they have a high percentage of apps from foreign applicants because domestic students generally place more weight on both location and overall rankings. The students accepted have very strong academic records and show a strong interest in the particular research being done. As V says above, don't apply to a place that doesn't do what you are interested in and certainly don't think that a low ranking from a magazine is any indication of quality of a program in any particular subfield or ease of acceptance.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
806
Replies
6
Views
974
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top