Exploring Beam Physics & Technology Degrees for ME Students

AI Thread Summary
For students interested in pursuing a career in particle accelerators and beam physics, transitioning from mechanical engineering to a physics or electrical engineering major is advisable, as most relevant work occurs at the graduate level. Top universities in the U.S. for this field include UCLA, USC, Stanford, Maryland, Indiana, and MIT. Engaging in specialized particle accelerator schools is recommended, as they offer university credits and provide essential knowledge about the field, including current trends and key figures. These programs also facilitate networking opportunities with professionals and researchers, which can be beneficial for future collaborations. Students should consult academic advisors and explore course offerings at institutions like the U.S. Particle Accelerator School (USPAS) for additional resources and learning opportunities.
SigurRos
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Im a first year mechanical engineering student, and I think that I would like to do work with particle accelerators (beam physics and technology). Does anyone have any recommendations as to what specific degree(s) I should look into, and which schools have great programs? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mechanical engineering isn't that suitable for what you want to do. You will either have to change to a physics major, or an electrical engineering major. You also won't be doing much in that area as an undergraduate. Most of the actual, real work in beam and accelerator physics are done at the graduate level, be it in physics or in electrical engineering.

There are several very good schools (assuming you're in the US) for such a program: UCLA, USC, Stanford, Maryland, Indiana, MIT, etc. In many cases, you will also be taking several intense courses at various Particle Accelerator schools being offered at different times of the year at various locations.

The following is Entry #28 in my Journal on Particle Accelerator School, re-copied here in case many people don't read people's journals.

ZapperZ's Journal said:
Update 10/31/2005: If you like doing E&M, if you're a physics or electrical engineering major, if you like doing numerical modelling/simulations, or if you just like accelerating particles to really, really high speeds, you may want to consider going into particle accelerators/beam physics in grad school. This is a repost of an entry from the old Journal.

******************

One of the things that I had to learn upon switching fields from condensed matter to particle accelerator physics was the subject matter itself. While I had the basics of E&M, I had to learn how such things are applied in the specific area of particle accelerators and beam physics. I also had to learn the state of the field - what are known, what are being done, what are the "hot" areas, what are the major issues and problems, and what are the current demand and direction the field is going. To a lesser degree, I also had to learn some of the "names" of the important people in the field, and also try to figure out what they look like. While these things are not part of the physics curriculum in school, they are a very important part of the practice of physics. You need to know who are the big names in the field, know what they look like, because chances are, you will bump into them and may want to talk to them. This is how you make yourself known to others, especially if you're new in the field and haven't come up from the "ranks". That was my situation when I entered this field.

One of the ways I tried to learn my way around was to attend a particle accelerator school. This is a program offered at various times of the year to students interested in going into particle accelerator and beam physics. Since this program is highly specialized and not many universities offer a complete menu of the necessary courses, the particle accelerator physicists decided a long time ago to offer a series of courses that carry university credits, be it at the undergraduate or graduate level. Practically all universities accept such credits as part of the student's curriculum. So a student who wants to go into this field can spend maybe a summer taking relevant courses and have those become part of his or her academic records at his/her home university.

This program is also valuable to postdocs and others who are entering the field (such as me). There are a large variety of such particle accelerator schools within a year, and a more "general", survey type was the one I attended a few years ago. It was highly useful because I got to have an overview of the whole field, learn the "language" that was being used, got to meet many important figures in the field who volunteered to be the instructors in the various courses (example: Tom Wangler, who wrote the definitive book in RF linear accelerator, was teaching that course using his book), and generally managed to get acquainted with people in the field. This was highly valuable because since then, I've had a few collaborations with the people I made contact with at this particle accelerator school.

The particle accelerator school in the US is offered several times throughout the year, and especially over the summer months. There are also particle accelerator schools being offered in Japan, Europe, and Russia. in fact, there have been several joint US-Japan-Europe-Russia particle accelerator schools being offered at various parts of the world.

If you are intersted in attending one of these, talk to your academic advisor/supervisor and look at the courses being offered at

http://uspas.fnal.gov

There are also links to other particle accelerator schools and programs being offered throughout the world.

Zz.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top