What is Alice Law's unique take on gravity and relativity?

Click For Summary
Alice Law is a freeware program that provides detailed explanations of Special and General Relativity, available for download or online use. It presents a unique perspective on gravity, suggesting that objects attract each other due to their expansion, rather than mass bending space-time as traditionally described in General Relativity. This interpretation has raised skepticism, with some labeling the program as crackpot and anti-relativity. The discussion highlights a divergence from established scientific consensus, prompting questions about the validity of its claims. Overall, the program's unconventional take on gravity may not be taken seriously by the scientific community.
hover
Messages
342
Reaction score
0
What is this?

I recently found this random program called "Alice Law". Its a freeware program and you can download it http://www.aliceinphysics.com/" for free or there is also an online version on that site. It is a nice little program that explains in detail (at least to me) about Special and General Relativity. While going through it though, in the section of Principle of Forces under GR, it talks about gravity and why objects gravitate towards other objects. The explanation seems different in this program than what i have heard before. Most people in GR say that mass bends space-time and the object follows the straightest path it can. IN THIS PROGRAM though, it says that objects attract each other because object (which are made of energy) expand. Making an illution that objects "fall" towards each other. What is right here??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a crackpot, anti-relativity site. Not worth your time.
 

Thread 'EPR revisited'

In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...
View full post »

Similar threads

High School Does Relativity Impact Gravity's Influence on Fast-Moving Objects?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Undergrad Question about geometrical engineering (placeholder name)
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
Undergrad Questions regarding traveling speed in time and gravity as a force
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
7K
What does G mean in general relativity?
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
5K
Undergrad General Relativity: Angular Momentum, Gravity & Questions
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Undergrad GR vs Newtonian Physics: Mass Curving Spacetime & Gravity Effects
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Undergrad How Does General Relativity Explain Gravity's Conundrum?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
High School Mechanics behind curved time causing gravitation/geodesics
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
High School Can an Object Exceed the Speed of Light?
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
High School Understanding Gravity & Orbits in Light of Relativity
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K