Exploring Induction in Rotating Spheres: Is My Solution Valid?

In summary, the conversation discusses the method used to calculate induced emf in a rotating sphere with a confined magnetic field. The proper surface area element is given and the magnetic field is assumed to have a magnitude of B. Integrating over the surface with a particular theta value results in the same formula for induced emf, multiplied by the magnitude of B. The method used involves taking the dot product and then integrating it over the given surface. However, there were some mistakes in the equations that were pointed out and had to be corrected.
  • #1
Nirmal Padwal
41
2
Homework Statement
A spherical shell of radius ##a## rotates about the ##z##-axis with angular velocity ##\omega##. It is in a uniform induction which is in ##xz## plane and at an angle ##\alpha## with the axis of rotation. Find the induced electric field at each point on the sphere.
Relevant Equations
##1. d\Phi = \vec{B}.d\vec{a}##
##2. E_{ind} = \frac{d\Phi}{dt}##
Let ##(r,\phi, \theta)## be the radial, polar and azimuthal coordinates respectively.

As ##\vec{B}## is confined to ##xz## plane such that ##\theta = \alpha## I assumed ##\vec{B}## on the surface of shell to be ##\vec{B} = a\sin(\alpha) \hat x + \cos(\alpha) \hat z \tag{1}##

Surface area element is ##\mathrm d\vec{a} = a^2 \sin(\theta)\,\mathrm d\theta\, \mathrm d\phi \hat r##. On converting to cartesian coordinates, ##\mathrm d\vec{a} = a^2 \sin(\theta),\mathrm d\theta\,\mathrm d\phi\ (\sin(\theta)\cos(\phi)\hat x)##
or $$\mathrm d\vec{a}= a^2 \sin^2(\theta)\cos(\phi)\,\mathrm d\theta\,\mathrm d\phi \hat x \tag{2}$$

Now what we traditionally do is take the dot product of ##(1)## and ##(2)## and then integrate it over the given surface (in this case the surface of sphere). But what I did was as follows:

As the sphere is rotating about ##z## axis, ##\phi = \omega t + \phi_0## (I assumed ##\phi_0## can be taken as zero as its value should not affect the final answer drastically)
Assume a particular ##\theta##, for this ##\theta## we substitute ##\phi = \omega t## in ##(2)## and get $$d\vec{a} = a^2 \sin^2(\theta)\cos(\omega t)\,\mathrm d\theta\,\mathrm d(\omega t) \hat x$$ or $$\mathrm d\vec{a} = \omega a^2 \sin^2(\theta) \cos(\omega t)\,\mathrm d\theta\,\mathrm dt \hat x$$

Now, we know that, flux through ##\mathrm d\vec{a}## is ##\mathrm d\Phi = \vec{B}\cdot\mathrm d\vec{a}## i.e
$$\mathrm d\Phi = (a\sin(\alpha))(\omega a^2 \sin^2 (\theta)\cos(\omega t)\,\mathrm d\theta\,\mathrm dt)$$ or $$\mathrm d\Phi = \omega a^3 \sin(\alpha) \sin^2 (\theta)\cos(\omega t)\,\mathrm dt$$ or

$$\frac{\mathrm d\Phi}{\mathrm dt}= \omega a^3 \sin(\alpha) \sin^2(\theta) \cos(\omega t)$$

But this for a particular $\theta$, we now integrate this for ##\theta : 0 \rightarrow \pi## to obtain $$\frac{\mathrm d\Phi}{\mathrm dt} = \frac{\pi}{2} \omega a^3 \sin(\alpha) \cos(\omega t) \tag{3}$$

Now induced emf will just be, by Faraday's law of induction, the negative of ##(3)##

As I did not use the traditional method and this was an even-numbered problem (so I don't have the final answer either), I was not sure if this is solution is valid. Please let me know if it is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Nirmal Padwal said:
As ##\vec{B}## is confined to ##xz## plane such that ##\theta = \alpha## I assumed ##\vec{B}## on the surface of shell to be ##\vec{B} = a\sin(\alpha) \hat x + \cos(\alpha) \hat z \tag{1}##
If you've been given the intensity of this magnetic field(induction), shouldn't it read ##\vec{B} = B\sin(\alpha) \hat x + B\cos(\alpha) \hat z##? That makes more sense to me, than putting ##B## to be a projection of radius, or whatever. ##\vec{B}## is uniform, so it doesn't matter if it's on the surface of the sphere or not, it's passing through it, and is everywhere constant, that's what the exercise says.
Nirmal Padwal said:
Surface area element is ##\mathrm d\vec{a} = a^2 \sin(\theta)\,\mathrm d\theta\, \mathrm d\phi \hat r##. On converting to cartesian coordinates, ##\mathrm d\vec{a} = a^2 \sin(\theta),\mathrm d\theta\,\mathrm d\phi\ (\sin(\theta)\cos(\phi)\hat x)##
or $$\mathrm d\vec{a}= a^2 \sin^2(\theta)\cos(\phi)\,\mathrm d\theta\,\mathrm d\phi \hat x \tag{2}$$
You have here converted ##\hat{r}## into something parallel to ##\hat{x}##. Those sines and cosines you added only mean the intensity is modified, but essentially, you said that radial unit vector is parallel to the unit vector in ##x## direction, which is obviously incorrect. The transformation law would be:
$$\hat{r} = \sin{\theta}\cos{\phi}\hat{x} + \sin{\theta}\sin{\phi}\hat{y} + \cos{\theta}\hat{z}$$

The rest of it is wrong because of the above two reasons, but you can proceed in the same manner as you did, the method is fine. You just have to be careful with the transformations.
Also keep in mind that ##E_{\text{ind}}## is a potential induced by this change of flux, not the electric field.
 
  • #3
Thank you for pointing out those mistakes.

So if I assume ##\vec {B}## to have a magnitude ##B## then
$$\vec{B} = Ba sin (\alpha) \hat x + B cos (\alpha) \hat z $$

Also, as you pointed out, the correct surface area element is
$$d\vec {a} = a^2 sin^2 (\theta)cos(\phi) d\theta d\phi \hat x + a^2 sin (\theta) cos(\theta) \hat z $$

Then $$\mathrm d\Phi = \omega a^3 \sin(\alpha) \sin^2 (\theta)\cos(\omega t)\,\mathrm dt + Ba^2 cos(\alpha) sin (\theta) cos (\theta) $$

Now if I integrate this from ##\theta : 0 \rightarrow \pi## the second term evaluates to zero.

So I essentially get the same result for ##\frac {d\Phi}{dt}## as above, just multiplied by magnitude of induction ##B##. Is this correct?
 
  • #4
Nirmal Padwal said:
So if I assume ##\vec {B}## to have a magnitude ##B## then
$$\vec{B} = Ba sin (\alpha) \hat x + B cos (\alpha) \hat z $$
No need for ##a## in there, you're projecting ##\vec{B}##, so it should just be the same formula but without ##a## in it. Sines and cosines determine the value of projections, radius has nothing to do with that.
Nirmal Padwal said:
Also, as you pointed out, the correct surface area element is
$$d\vec {a} = a^2 sin^2 (\theta)cos(\phi) d\theta d\phi \hat x + a^2 sin (\theta) cos(\theta) \hat z $$

Then $$\mathrm d\Phi = \omega a^3 \sin(\alpha) \sin^2 (\theta)\cos(\omega t)\,\mathrm dt + Ba^2 cos(\alpha) sin (\theta) cos (\theta) $$

Now if I integrate this from ##\theta : 0 \rightarrow \pi## the second term evaluates to zero.

So I essentially get the same result for ##\frac {d\Phi}{dt}## as above, just multiplied by magnitude of induction ##B##. Is this correct?
You misplaced the differentials but that may be a typing mistake. Either way, the solution for ##\tfrac{d\Phi}{dt}## is similar, you just have ##Ba^2## in the first term instead of ##a^3##, according to the correct formula for projection I mentioned earlier.
 
  • Like
Likes Nirmal Padwal

1. What is induction in rotating spheres?

Induction in rotating spheres is a phenomenon in which an electric current is induced in a rotating conducting sphere when it is placed in a magnetic field. This is also known as Faraday's Law of Induction.

2. Why is it important to explore induction in rotating spheres?

Exploring induction in rotating spheres can help us understand the relationship between electricity and magnetism. This phenomenon has various practical applications, such as in generators and motors.

3. How do you determine if a solution for induction in rotating spheres is valid?

A solution for induction in rotating spheres is valid if it satisfies Faraday's Law, which states that the induced electromotive force (EMF) is equal to the rate of change of magnetic flux through the surface of the sphere.

4. What factors affect the magnitude of induction in rotating spheres?

The magnitude of induction in rotating spheres is affected by the strength of the magnetic field, the speed of rotation, and the size and material of the sphere.

5. What are some potential challenges in exploring induction in rotating spheres?

Some potential challenges in exploring induction in rotating spheres include accurately measuring the magnetic field and rotation speed, as well as considering the effects of other variables such as temperature and friction. Additionally, the complex mathematical calculations involved in analyzing this phenomenon may also pose a challenge.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
426
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
944
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top