Exploring Motion in One Dimension: Understanding Ascent and Descent Times

  • Thread starter Thread starter ranjitnepal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Motion
AI Thread Summary
When an object is thrown upwards, the time of ascent and descent is generally similar, with variations primarily due to air resistance. The descent time may appear longer because air resistance affects the object's speed differently on the way up and down. As potential energy remains constant at the same height, the kinetic energy during descent is reduced due to energy loss from air resistance. The impact of air resistance varies significantly based on the object's shape and speed, influencing its behavior in ascent and descent. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate analysis in physics.
ranjitnepal
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
when we throw an object upwards why the time of descent is greater rhan time of ascent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not.

The object's descent is just a time-reversed ascent, because total energy is conserved.
 
ranjitnepal said:
when we throw an object upwards why the time of descent is greater rhan time of ascent?

What specific situation are you considering? In general, the two times will be about the same, with any difference being caused by air resistance acting differently on the ascent and the descent.
 
in case we consider air resistance
 
in case we consider air resistance
Don't you think it would have been a good idea to tell us that initially?

The speed coming down will be less than the speed going up because the potential energy will be the same at the same height but the total energy will be less because of energy lost to air resitance. So kinetic energy will be less at the same height coming down than going up.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
ranjitnepal said:
in case we consider air resistance

Even then, the details matter. A dense sphere (think cannonball) with an initial speed of a few tens of meters per second will not be measurably affected by air resistance - and this is also the problem you'll most often encountered in introductory physics classes. On the other hand, a spin-stabilized projectile that tumbles on the the way down, or a projectile whose initial velocity exceeds its terminal velocity in air will behave very differently on ascent and descent.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
872
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
1K
Back
Top