How Can Variational Calculus Enhance Your Understanding of Quantum Mechanics?

aliaze1
Messages
173
Reaction score
1
I am taking a Quantum Mechanics course this semester and the professor started off by showing us how Newtonian Mechanics lead to Lagrangian Mechanics, then Hamiltonian...etc...until we got to the Quantum Mechanical wave functions.

This was all done in a quantitative sense, using variational calculus. Does anyone know of any good mathematics/physics/mathematical physics textbook that goes into this type of detail for mechanics? I was looking into "Advanced Calculus" by Loomis, since Loomis' Calculus book was amazing, I imagine the Advanced book would be good too..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you have got a very good teacher. many times such personal viewpoints are impossible to find in any book. and taking lessons from classroom is the only way to get such personal viewpoints. so absorb it as much as you can. discuss with the person too. you will not get a chance later on.
 
Of course you'll need some calculus, but I also suggest you get a good understanding of linear algebra. You might also start looking at the Dirac notation (after you study a little linear algebra).
In older QM books you see states expressed in terms of wave functions with integrals, etc. and a lot of calculus. Newer books use more the Dirac notation, which is based on the linear algebra and the fact that you can represent functions in a "Hilbert space"
Books:
"Classical Mechanics" by Herbert Goldstein.
"Mathematical Methods for Physicsists" Arfken.
"Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences" is also good. But Arfken is a little more advanced I think. It wouldn't hurt having both.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top