Could 5-Dimensional Bubbles Explain the Big Bang?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Peanut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang Bubbles
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of two 5-dimensional bubbles colliding in 5-dimensional space, suggesting that their intersection occurs at a 3-dimensional point. This point serves as a boundary where a 4-dimensional hyperplane emerges and expands, potentially explaining the Big Bang as a spontaneous event from nothingness. The nature of a point in geometry is highlighted as having zero dimensions, making it a fundamental yet undefined entity. The interaction between the bubbles upon collision is contingent on the physics governing their composition. Overall, the idea presents a theoretical framework for understanding cosmic origins through higher-dimensional interactions.
Mr Peanut
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Say I have two 5-dimensional bubbles moving towards one another in 5-dimensional space. When they touch, at the monent they touch, they meet at a 3-dimensional "point." As they join, the 4-dimensional hyperplane created their by common boundary immediately inflates from that point and expands.

Is that about right ?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Mr Peanut said:
Say I have two 5-dimensional bubbles...in 5-dimensional space...they meet at a 3-dimensional "point."

At first glance, just as two circles meet at an X,Y point (two-dimensional), and two spheres meet at a three-dimensional X,Y,Z point, it seems two 5-dimensional 'bubbles' or any 5-dimensional objects must require a 5-dimensional coordinate to specify a point of intersection.
 
Perhaps...

The notion of a point is more often an undefined entity in geometry, an axiomatic primitive that has no meaning beyond the intuitive. Any rigorous definition results in a circular arguments.

While a point may be designated with any number of dimensions depending on the space, it alway has a magnitude of zero in every direction. A point on a line and a point on a plane could be seen as equivalent objects.

Back to bubbles. The four diminsenional space arises from the "point." An observer in the 4-D hyperplane at some later time would remark; "the universe spontaneously arose from nothingness."
 
Last edited:
Mr Peanut said:
Say I have two 5-dimensional bubbles moving towards one another in 5-dimensional space. When they touch, at the monent they touch, they meet at a 3-dimensional "point."
A point has no dimensions.

Mr Peanut said:
As they join, the 4-dimensional hyperplane created their by common boundary immediately inflates from that point and expands.
The way you stated this question was too vague for me to answer what the dimensionality of the intersection would be. However, how two such bubbles interact when they meet depends entirely upon the physics of whatever they are made of.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top