Exploring the Effects of Combining Small Magnets in a Cube or Sphere Shape

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Energize
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effects of combining small 1.5 tesla rare Earth magnets into larger shapes, specifically cubes and spheres. It is established that assembling multiple small magnets increases the overall magnetic field strength, allowing for the lifting of heavier objects due to enhanced contact area. The lifting force is mathematically represented by the formula F=2πM²A, where M is the magnetization and A is the contact area. However, the magnetic field strength just outside the magnet does not depend on the surface area, and the formula applies only if the magnet is sufficiently large to neglect the effects of distant faces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic field theory
  • Familiarity with magnetization concepts
  • Knowledge of Gaussian units in physics
  • Basic grasp of the relationship between surface area and lifting force
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of domain theory in magnetism
  • Explore advanced magnetic field calculations using finite element analysis
  • Investigate the effects of magnet shape on lifting capacity
  • Learn about the properties of rare Earth magnets and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Physics enthusiasts, engineers working with magnetic systems, and anyone interested in the practical applications of magnetism in lifting mechanisms.

Energize
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
If you combine many small magnets together in a cube or spherical shape (say those 1.5 tesla rare Earth magnets), is the resulting magnetic field able to affect even heavier objects, or is there no difference in the range/energy of the field?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Energize said:
If you combine many small magnets together in a cube or spherical shape (say those 1.5 tesla rare Earth magnets), is the resulting magnetic field able to affect even heavier objects, or is there no difference in the range/energy of the field?

Well I know that the magnetic field definitely does get stronger when you make a big cube out of many small magnetised cubes because I've tried it.

Makes sense really, the domain theory says that a magnet that you can hold in your hand is just a collection of very tiny microscopic (weak) magnets all side by side, and end to end. Put them all together and you can pick up comparatively gigantic objects(compared to the size and strength of the domains) .

So yes, the more you have the stronger the field.
 
If you build a cube out of rectangular magnets, The lifting force will be increase as the contact area of a face of the cube and the face of the object to be picked up.
In gaussian units, F=2pi M^2 A for the lifting force of a magnet of magnetization M on a high mu object, with A the contact area.
 
clem said:
If you build a cube out of rectangular magnets, The lifting force will be increase as the contact area of a face of the cube and the face of the object to be picked up.
In gaussian units, F=2pi M^2 A for the lifting force of a magnet of magnetization M on a high mu object, with A the contact area.

So this would mean that for 2 magnets with the same volume, the one with the biggest surface-area would have the strongest field. Is that correct?
 
Not quite. The B field just outside the magnet does not depend on the area.
The lifting force ~B times the area of contact between the magnet and the flat surface of an iron object.
One other thing. The formula I gave is only if the magnet is large enough that effect of the distant face can be neglected. If the magnet is too thin, the the effects of the close face and the distant face tend to cancel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K