What Insights Does the Fourth Dimension Offer About Our Universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter timel0rd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores how four-dimensional objects interact with our three-dimensional universe, using the analogy of a bowling pin passing through a two-dimensional space. Observers in lower dimensions perceive only slices of higher-dimensional objects, leading to changes in size and shape as these objects move through their universe. The conversation suggests that all motion could be interpreted as varying cross-sections of four-dimensional entities. Additionally, it introduces concepts like World Lines and World Sheets, which represent the history and structure of these objects in spacetime. The complexity of visualizing four-dimensional hypersurfaces is acknowledged, particularly in relation to closed surfaces.
timel0rd
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
To start, let's say I took a bowling pin and passed it through a two-dimensional universe. An observer in the two-dimensional universe would see a two dimensional slice of the bowling pin expanding and contracting as the bowling pin passed through their universe. Similarly, a 4-dimensional object passing through a 3-dimensional universe would appear to be an 3 dimensional object changing size and shape.

When a balloon is inflated, it changes size. Could the inflated balloon and the deflated balloon be different cross-sections of the same four dimensional object passing through out three-dimensional universe?

Could all motion simply be changing cross sections of four dimensional objects passing through our universe. Think of the two-dimensional universe again. If you took a 'V' and passed it through the two-dimensional universe, the observer would see a single object appear and then two objects break apart and move away from each other.
 
Space news on Phys.org
The history of the positions of a point throughout all moments in time forms a one-dimensional object in spacetime - a World Line. Likewise, the world lines emerging from all the points of a one-dimensional space-like curve delimit a two-dimensional "World sheet". If the space-like curve was a loop, the World sheet would be the envelope of a cylinder. Analogously, the world lines emerging from a space-like surface element would fill in the interior of this cylinder.

Now, we come to a point that I can no longer envisage intuitively. If you consider a closed space-like surface (a ball, for example), it cannot be encircled by a closed line uniquely (you may draw infinitely many circles on the surface of a ball), and I don't know how to envisage the 4-dimensional hypersurface formed by the world lines emerging from these points.

In any case, this hypersurface envelopes a region in 4-dimensional spacetime filled by the world lines emerging from the points interior to the closed surface (points inside the ball in our example).
 
Last edited:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
261
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top