Is Our Universe Just a Preon in a Larger Cosmic Structure?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ziad1985
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the idea that our universe might be a preon within a larger cosmic structure, suggesting a connection between the smallest and largest scales of existence. Theories in particle physics propose that matter is composed of preons, which could imply that these fundamental particles represent entire universes themselves. The conversation touches on the implications of a closed universe, asserting that it must be self-contained, linking the smallest scales to the largest. Participants argue that this framework aligns with the Mach principle, indicating a coherent relationship between all scales of the universe. The concept of a photon exemplifies this duality, being both the smallest and largest entity in relative terms.
ziad1985
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
I don't actually know if i should have started this thread in Astrophysics forum or Particle Physics forum.
Anyway here the issue , some theories of our universe say that it may actually be a part of one bigger universe(sub-universe , ...).
One theory of particle physics says that matter maybe consisted of Preons , the actual fundamental material of our world and the subcomponents of quarks and leptons.
Regardless of how strong or weak these 2 points stated above maybe.
what kind of restriction or possibilities i can talk about that our universe maybe a Preon in the bigger universe , and that the Preons in our universe are actually universes of their own ?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Or the preon is our universe causing a connection between the largest object of the universe and the smallest.

If this is coupled with a closed universe then we are contained.

Duane
 
But wouldn't be contained anyway ?
a closed or not ..
 
By definition, the universe is everything (including the sub-, sub-sub- and sub-sub-sub-universes), i.e., it MUST be self-contained. Therefore, the above mentioned Preon particle (representing the smallest possible scale) has to be linked to the entire universe on its largest scale (not going to another universe). This would make the universe self-contained and would automatically implement the Mach principle. There are some indications that such a scheme might actually work pretty well.
 
Last edited:
the above mentioned Preon particle (representing the smallest possible scale) has to be linked to the entire universe on its largest scale (not going to another universe).


A photon is length contracted almost to zero length, and at the same time it is time dilated almost to a stand still, a single particle that is at the same time both smallest and largest on our relative scale.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top