Finding Angle and Intensity of Split Rocket at Maximum Height

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the angle and intensity of the second part of a split rocket at its maximum height. The initial velocity is denoted as ##v_0##, and the angle of launch is ##\theta##. At maximum height, the rocket's velocity has only an x-component, calculated as ##v_0 \cos \theta##. The momentum conservation principle is applied, leading to the conclusion that the second part must have a vertical component equal to that of the first part, resulting in a final velocity of ##1000 m/s## for the x-component of the second part.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion and components of velocity
  • Knowledge of momentum conservation principles
  • Familiarity with vector addition in physics
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of projectile motion in detail
  • Learn about momentum conservation in multi-part systems
  • Explore vector decomposition and addition techniques
  • Practice solving similar physics problems involving split projectiles
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and projectile motion, as well as educators looking for examples of momentum conservation in action.

doktorwho
Messages
181
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


A rocket is fired from from the ground at initial velocity of ##v_0## and at an angle ##\theta##. At its highest height it splits into 2 parts of equal masses. The first part is fired straight up and at velocity ##v_0/2##. Find the angle and intensity of the second part.

Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
At its maximum height the velocity has only the x component which is ##v_0cos\theta##. The momentum is ##p_0=mv_0cos\theta##. Since it has only the x component and the part which divides has the y component the second part must have an equal y component. Mening the ##v_{2y}=v_{1y}=v_0/2##. That would make the change in the y component of the momentum ##0##. Since that starting condition has total momentum in x direction the ##v_2## part must have the x component equal to the ##v_0cos\theta##. The intensity would then be ##\sqrt{v_{2y}^2+v_{2x}^2}##. Does this seem right couse when i use it in the problem given by the books where this intial velocity is ##1000## the angle ##60## i get ##v_y=500\sqrt{2}## and the book gives ##v_y=1118##?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When the problem says that the first part is fired straight up, I think it means straight up relative to someone on the ground - not straight up relative to the moving projectile.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: doktorwho
Your method sounds correct in general, though I get a different answer from you when using that approach. I think the book is correct.
Perhaps you could show your working in detail.
I think you may be going wrong in the horizontal component, what you label v2y
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: doktorwho
Merlin3189 said:
Your method sounds correct in general, though I get a different answer from you when using that approach. I think the book is correct.
Perhaps you could show your working in detail.
I think you may be going wrong in the horizontal component, what you label v2y
At the max heigth the velocity has only the x-component which is ##v_0cos\theta=500m/s##. Since it then splits into two parts they both must have 0 net y velocity and 500m/s in the x-component. ##v_{1y}=500m/s## and ##v_{1x}=0##. From there it follows that the vertical component of the second velocity must be ##500m/s## in order for the y-components to cancel out.
The x component must be equal to ##m*500m/s##. So ##\frac{m}{2}v_{2x}=m500##. So it should be ##1000m/s## Now i get it right. I forgot the fact that the mass splits so i thought that i have full mass of velocity 2. Good now.
 
Exactly where I went wrong myself at first attempt!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
62
Views
7K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
3K
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K