Is There a Formula for Fitting a Sum of Exponentials to Data Points?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gonzolo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential Fit
AI Thread Summary
To fit the equation y = A(exp(-Bx) - exp(-Cx)) to data points, three undetermined constants A, B, and C must be solved using three equations derived from selected (x,y) data points. The fitting process can yield different results depending on which data points are chosen, especially when using the least squares method. Exact fitting is not possible due to inherent noise in experimental data. Additionally, determining error estimates for A, B, and C in the best fit is a relevant concern for accuracy. Overall, while a formula for fitting exists, the process involves complexities due to data variability and noise.
Gonzolo
Hi, I want fit the following equation to a set of data points :

y = A(exp(-Bx)-exp(-Cx)))

I found how to determine A and B for one exp : y = Aexp(-Bx), but I'm not sure if there's a formula for A, B and C in such a sum (or difference) of exponentials. Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There isn't a formula but there is a general concept:
y = A(exp(-Bx)-exp(-Cx)))
has 3 undetermined constants, A, B, and C so you will need to solve three equations for them. Take three of your (x,y) data points and plug the values for x and y into the formula. Solve those three equations for A, B, C.

If you have more than 3 data points, and the formula is not and exact fit, the result will depend upon which 3 you choose.
 
I have tried to fit using the least squares method (with Excel) and that is what I find, that the results depend on what initial values I choose. So if what your saying in your last sentence is generally true, I suppose there no way to find the absolute minimum of the least squares sum, right?

If by exact, you mean that each data point should be on the curve exactly, then no it cannot be exact, since it is true experimental data, and there is a little noise.

Is there a way to determine an error for A, B, and C on the best fit that I choose?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top