(Exponential growth/decay) If f'(x) = -f(x) and f(1) = 1 then

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alcubierre
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a differential equation where the derivative of a function is equal to the negative of the function itself, specifically f'(x) = -f(x), with an initial condition f(1) = 1. Participants are exploring the implications of this equation and its solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various approaches to solving the differential equation, including attempts to evaluate multiple-choice options and the implications of the initial condition. Some question the necessity of solving the equation versus testing the given options directly.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different methods to approach the problem, with some participants providing guidance on solving the differential equation and others reflecting on their attempts and misunderstandings. The discussion is active, with participants engaging in clarifying their reasoning and correcting mistakes.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the necessity of the multiple-choice format and how it influences their approach to the problem. There are also mentions of potential mistakes in the integration process and the importance of including constants of integration.

Alcubierre
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If f'(x) = -f(x) and f(1) = 1, then f(x) = ?

(A) [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex]e-2x+2.
(B) e-x-1.
(C) e1-x.
(D) e-x.
(E) -ex.

Homework Equations



P(t) = P0ekt.
[itex]\frac{dP}{dt}[/itex] = kP.

The Attempt at a Solution



I was thinking f(1) = t and 1 = P0, therefore:

P(1) = ek.

Then, I exponetiated both sides and got:

ln(P(1)) = k.

I'm probably going off in a completely different direction, but this is what I did so far.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't even have to solve the differential equation. You just have to figure out which one of them work. That's the beauty of multiple choice.
 
I did try that, and the only one I got remotely close to that is letter C, which I got -1 but I set it up as:

-(e1-x)|x = 1 = -1.

The negative is there because -f(x), is that correct or do I leave it out?

EDIT: Oh my, never mind that. I am finding f(1), which if I evaluate letter C at x = 1, I will get 1. Thank you for leading me on the right direction, Dick!
 
Last edited:
You are absolutely right, I misread it. Thank you. But say I didn't have the multiple choice, how would I come about doing this problem, or is there no way?
 
Alcubierre said:
You are absolutely right, I misread it. Thank you. But say I didn't have the multiple choice, how would I come about doing this problem, or is there no way?

Sure. Solve the differential equation. df/dt=(-f). Separate the variables, then use the initial condition.
 
Okay, this is what I did:

[itex]\frac{df}{dt}[/itex] = -f

[itex]\int\frac{df}{-f}[/itex] = [itex]\int dt[/itex]

-ln|f| = t

-f = et and obtain:

f = -et.

Where did I go wrong?
 
Alcubierre said:
Okay, this is what I did:

[itex]\frac{df}{dt}[/itex] = -f

[itex]\int\frac{df}{-f}[/itex] = [itex]\int dt[/itex]

-ln|f| = t

-f = et and obtain:

f = -et.

Where did I go wrong?

You started out going wrong by forgetting the constant of integration -ln(f)=t+C. Then it got worse when you decided e^(-ln(f))=(-f). That's not right. I'd suggest moving the minus sign over to the t side before you exponentiate.
 
Last edited:
Wow, of course. Careless mistake.

Alas! I got it!
Thank you so very much, you were of much help.

Have a good night, my friend.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K