Express moment / expectation value in lower order expectation values

flux2
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,

I'm looking for a proof of the following equation:

<x6> = <x>6+15s2<x>4

where the brackets denote an expectationvalue and s is the standard deviation.

Thanks in advance!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It is not true in general. For example if <x> = 0, <x6> will not = 0 unless x = 0 itself.
 
mathman said:
It is not true in general. For example if <x> = 0, <x6> will not = 0 unless x = 0 itself.

Sorry, I forgot to mention. It's a first order Taylor approximation.

Thanks for the reply,

Cheers
 
We have for example:

<x2> = <x>2+s2


<x4> - <x2>2 ≈ 4s2<x>2 (to first order)

Now combining both equations yields:

<x4> = <x>4+6s2<x>2

Unfortunately this doesn't work that easily for <x6>
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top