MHB Expressing a polynomial P(x)=(x−a)^2(x−b)^2+1 by two other polynomials

AI Thread Summary
The polynomial P(x) = (x-a)²(x-b)² + 1, where a and b are distinct integers, cannot be factored into two nonconstant polynomials with integer coefficients. The discussion emphasizes the need for a proof to establish this fact. Participants share different approaches to the problem, highlighting the complexity of polynomial factorization. The conversation includes expressions of appreciation for contributions and alternative solutions. Ultimately, the consensus is that the polynomial's structure prevents such a factorization.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Let $a$ and $b$ be two integer numbers, $a \ne b$. Prove, that the polynomial:

$$P(x) = (x-a)^2(x-b)^2 + 1$$

cannot be expressed as a product of two nonconstant polynomials with integer coefficients.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
Let $a$ and $b$ be two integer numbers, $a \ne b$. Prove, that the polynomial:

$$P(x) = (x-a)^2(x-b)^2 + 1$$

cannot be expressed as a product of two nonconstant polynomials with integer coefficients.

by letting t = x - a and hence x-b = t + a -b = t -c where c = b- a we get

$t^2(t-c)^2 + 1$ another polinomial in t

above has minimum value of 1 so this does not have linear factor as no real zero.

so we need to check if it has 2 quadratoc factors

1 can be expressed as 1 * 1 or - 1 * - 1 so we have 2 choices

$(t^2+nt +1)(t^2-nt + 1)$ n and -n because there is no term in t

this gives that there is no term in $t^3$ which is contradiction

similarly $(t^2+nt -1)(t^2-nt - 1)$ is ruled out

hence it cannot be factored
 
kaliprasad said:
by letting t = x - a and hence x-b = t + a -b = t -c where c = b- a we get

$t^2(t-c)^2 + 1$ another polinomial in t

above has minimum value of 1 so this does not have linear factor as no real zero.

so we need to check if it has 2 quadratoc factors

1 can be expressed as 1 * 1 or - 1 * - 1 so we have 2 choices

$(t^2+nt +1)(t^2-nt + 1)$ n and -n because there is no term in t

this gives that there is no term in $t^3$ which is contradiction

similarly $(t^2+nt -1)(t^2-nt - 1)$ is ruled out

hence it cannot be factored
Very nice, kaliprasad! Thankyou for your participation!The suggested solution differs a bit from kaliprasads, so I will post it here:

Suppose $P(x)$ is a product of two polynomials. Then these polynomials are monic and both have degree $2$, since the coefficient of $P(x)$ at $x^4$ is $1$, and $P(x) > 0$ has no real roots:

\[P(x) = (x^2+px+q)(x^2+rx+s)\]

At $x=a$ and $x=b$, $P(x)=1$, therefore: $x^2+px+q=x^2+rx+s = \pm 1$. Thus $px-rx+q-s$ has two different roots, $a$ and $b$, and therefore is identically zero: $p=r$ and $q=s$.

Then, we have: $P(x) = (x-a)^2(x-b)^2 + 1=(x^2+px+q)^2$.

Since, the only two squares, that differ by $1$ are $0^2$ and $1^2$, $P(x) = 1$. A contradiction.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top