Expressing the density matrix in matrix form

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
Morbidly_Green
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



page1-800px-Lambda-type_system.pdf.jpg


Given the above lambda system, is it wrong to say that the density matrix is of the form ## \rho = c_1|1> + c_2|2> + c_3|3> ## ? Hence when written in matrix form (basis of ##|i>##), ## \rho ## is a diagonal matrix who's elements are the ##c_i##s?
 

Attachments

  • page1-800px-Lambda-type_system.pdf.jpg
    page1-800px-Lambda-type_system.pdf.jpg
    12 KB · Views: 785
Physics news on Phys.org
Morbidly_Green said:
Given the above lambda system, is it wrong to say that the density matrix is of the form ## \rho = c_1|1> + c_2|2> + c_3|3> ## ? Hence when written in matrix form (basis of ##|i>##), ## \rho ## is a diagonal matrix who's elements are the ##c_i##s?
Yes, it is wrong because that ##\rho## is not a density operator, just a quantum state (ket). For pure states, the density operator will be a projection operator,
$$
| \psi \rangle \rightarrow \rho = | \psi \rangle \langle \psi |
$$
In the general case, one will have (for a basis ##| i \rangle##)
$$
\rho = \sum_i \sum_j c_{ij} | i \rangle \langle j|
$$
with the complex coefficients ##c_{ij}## to be determined for a particular state.
 
DrClaude said:
Yes, it is wrong because that ##\rho## is not a density operator, just a quantum state (ket). For pure states, the density operator will be a projection operator,
$$
| \psi \rangle \rightarrow \rho = | \psi \rangle \langle \psi |
$$
In the general case, one will have (for a basis ##| i \rangle##)
$$
\rho = \sum_i \sum_j c_{ij} | i \rangle \langle j|
$$
with the complex coefficients ##c_{ij}## to be determined for a particular state.

I see okay thank you