Extension of spring in a system with two pistons

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mechanics of a system with two pistons and a spring, analyzing the pressure changes and equilibrium conditions when the upper piston descends by ##y_1## and the lower piston descends by ##y_2##. The key equations derived include the pressure at the upper piston ##P_c=\frac{ky_1}{s_1}## and the equilibrium condition ##mg=P_a s_2##. The correct expression for ##y_1## is established as ##y_1=\frac{mgs_1}{ks_2+\rho g s_1 (s_1-s_2)}##, highlighting the importance of accurately accounting for pressure changes and the spring's force. Misconceptions regarding pressure changes and the role of the spring are clarified throughout the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid mechanics principles, particularly pressure and buoyancy.
  • Familiarity with spring mechanics and Hooke's Law.
  • Knowledge of equilibrium conditions in mechanical systems.
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations involving pressure and volume.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of fluid statics and dynamics, focusing on pressure calculations.
  • Learn about Hooke's Law and its application in mechanical systems involving springs.
  • Explore equilibrium analysis in multi-component systems, particularly involving pistons and fluids.
  • Investigate the effects of varying cross-sectional areas in hydraulic systems.
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, physics students, and anyone involved in fluid dynamics or mechanical system design will benefit from this discussion, particularly those working with piston-spring systems.

Bling Fizikst
Messages
119
Reaction score
16
Homework Statement
Refer to the image
Relevant Equations
Refer to the image
1716800392859.png


Let's say the upper piston goes down by ##y_1## and the lower piston goes down by ##y_2## after the block is suspended \ By volume conservation ##s_1 y_1=s_2 y_2## Let the pressure at the location of the upper piston be ##P_c=\frac{ky_1}{s_1}## Pressure at the lower piston : ##P_a=P_c+\rho g(h−y_1+y_2)## At point of equilibrium , ##mg=P_a s_2## Doing the calculations gives : ##y_1=\frac{mg s_1−\rho hgs_1 s_2}{ks_2+\rho g s_1(s_1−s_2)}## which is the wrong answer . I am not sure where i went wrong .
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bling Fizikst said:
Let the pressure at the location of the upper piston be ##P_c=ky_1s_1##
I don’t understand how you get that. k has dimension##MT^{-2}##, ##s_1y_1## is a volume, giving ##ML^3T^{-2}##, not ##ML^{-1}T^{-2}## (pressure).
 
haruspex said:
I don’t understand how you get that. k has dimension##MT^{-2}##, ##s_1y_1## is a volume, giving ##ML^3T^{-2}##, not ##ML^{-1}T^{-2}## (pressure).
sorry that was a typo . i edited it now
 
Bling Fizikst said:
sorry that was a typo . i edited it now
I think you are mixing up total pressures with changes in pressure.
If the upper piston descends ##y_1##, what is the change in pressure the piston exerts on the water? What is the change in water depth?
 
If the upper piston descends by ##y_1## then the corresponding change in pressure should be ##\rho g y_1## ? Change in water depth in the entire system due this change would be $$h-(h-y_1+y_2) = y_1-y_2$$ where ##y_2## can be written in terms of ##y_1## from the volmue conservation equation ?
 
Bling Fizikst said:
If the upper piston descends by ##y_1## then the corresponding change in pressure should be ##\rho g y_1## ?
No, I asked what the change in pressure exerted by the upper piston is. You had the expression for ##P_c##, but you called it the pressure, not the change in pressure. You also need to consider the sign.
Bling Fizikst said:
Change in water depth in the entire system due this change would be $$h-(h-y_1+y_2) = y_1-y_2$$
Again, be careful with signs.
 
haruspex said:
No, I asked what the change in pressure exerted by the upper piston is. You had the expression for ##P_c##, but you called it the pressure, not the change in pressure. You also need to consider the sign.

Again, be careful with signs.
So that means the change in pressure exerted by the upper piston should be : $$\frac{k y_1}{s_1} +\rho gy_1$$ And the change in the water depth of the system should be : $$h_f-h_i = (h-y_1+y_2)-h = y_2-y_1$$
 
Bling Fizikst said:
So that means the change in pressure exerted by the upper piston should be : $$\frac{k y_1}{s_1} +\rho gy_1$$
Why the second term? It's only the change in the spring length that alters the pressure exerted by the piston. But ##y_1## is an increase in length of the spring, so the pressure it exerts should reduce.
Bling Fizikst said:
And the change in the water depth of the system should be : $$h_f-h_i = (h-y_1+y_2)-h = y_2-y_1$$
Yes.
 
Bling Fizikst said:
Doing the calculations gives : ##y_1=\frac{mg s_1−\rho hgs_1 s_2}{ks_2+\rho g s_1(s_1−s_2)}## which is the wrong answer .
Could you show the correct answer?

Because the fluid is incompressible, the new force on the spring will be the addition of the weight of the block plus the unchanged weight of the water.
Our problem is that we don't know the value of the former.

Could you draw four FBD's for the pistons in both conditions?
 
  • #10
I am getting a contradiction even after trying to do this fundamentally
1716873815577.png

The answer key says : $$\frac{mgS_1}{kS_2-\rho g S_1 (S_1-S_2)}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #11
Please, consider that for initial conditions:
Pressure at B should be equal to Patm (the bottom piston is at balance).
Pressure at A should be less than pressure at B (with the help of the stretched spring, the top piston is pulling the weight of the water column underneath it).
 
  • #12
Bling Fizikst said:
I am getting a contradiction even after trying to do this fundamentally
View attachment 346105
The answer key says : $$\frac{mgS_1}{kS_2-\rho g S_1 (S_1-S_2)}$$
I cannot follow your reasoning from the various expressions scattered around that picture.

Let's go back to post #7.
I queried the ##\rho gy_1## term in the first equation. What is your answer to that?
I agreed with the second equation.
What do you then get for the pressure change just above the lower piston? What force change does that correspond to?
What equation relates that to mg?
 
  • #13
haruspex said:
I cannot follow your reasoning from the various expressions scattered around that picture.

Let's go back to post #7.
I queried the ##\rho gy_1## term in the first equation. What is your answer to that?
I agreed with the second equation.
What do you then get for the pressure change just above the lower piston? What force change does that correspond to?
What equation relates that to mg?
Here is my entire thought process , please do help me with the misconceptions that i have : Let's say initially the atmospheric pressure on the upper piston is ##P## and its the same just below it as well . Now , if the upper piston goes down by ##y_1## then the pressure on the upper piston increases to ##P+\rho g y_1## . This generates a force of ##(P+\rho g y_1 - P)s_1## which is to be balanced by the spring force , ##ky_1## . Giving the equation : $$ ky_1 = \rho g y_1$$ which is contradictory . For the lower piston , the change in pressure times the corresponding corss sectional area should be equal to ##mg## : $$ (P+\rho g h - (P+\rho g (h-y_1+y_2)) = mg $$
 
  • #14
Bling Fizikst said:
Let's say initially the atmospheric pressure on the upper piston is ##P## and its the same just below it as well .
What about the spring? It is not necessarily in its relaxed state. That is why it is easier to work in terms of changes to forces and pressures.
Bling Fizikst said:
Now , if the upper piston goes down by ##y_1## then the pressure on the upper piston increases to ##P+\rho g y_1## .
Eh? Why? The piston does not become immersed in water.
The spring changes length, though.
 
  • #15
haruspex said:
What about the spring? It is not necessarily in its relaxed state. That is why it is easier to work in terms of changes to forces and pressures.

Eh? Why? The piston does not become immersed in water.
The spring changes length, though.
Ahh i see . I redid the calculations now . If the upper piston went down by ##y_1## then the change in pressure exerted by the upperpiston would be $$\frac{ky_1}{s_1}$$ If the lower piston goes down by ##y_2## , then we can write the forces corresponding to change in pressures : $$ \left(\frac{ky_1}{s_1}+\rho g (h-y_1+y_2) - \rho g h\right)s_2 =mg$$ Doing the calculation gives : $$ y_1= \frac{mgs_1}{ks_2+\rho g s_1 (s_1-s_2)}$$ There still seems to be some slight error as there is a '-' in the denominator in the answer key .
 
  • #16
Bling Fizikst said:
Ahh i see . I redid the calculations now . If the upper piston went down by ##y_1## then the change in pressure exerted by the upperpiston would be $$\frac{ky_1}{s_1}$$ If the lower piston goes down by ##y_2## , then we can write the forces corresponding to change in pressures : $$ \left(\frac{ky_1}{s_1}+\rho g (h-y_1+y_2) - \rho g h\right)s_2 =mg$$ Doing the calculation gives : $$ y_1= \frac{mgs_1}{ks_2+\rho g s_1 (s_1-s_2)}$$ There still seems to be some slight error as there is a '-' in the denominator in the answer key .
Two sign errors.
When a spring extends, which way does the force it exerts change?
To balance the added mass at the bottom, which way does the force at the lower piston need to change?
 
  • #17
Bling Fizikst said:
Doing the calculation gives : $$ y_1= \frac{mgs_1}{ks_2+\rho g s_1 (s_1-s_2)}$$ There still seems to be some slight error as there is a '-' in the denominator in the answer key .
Let’s assume for a second that the container is perfectly cylindrical and that we have identical cross-section areas for the upper and lower pistons.
The height of the water column h should remain the same, regardless the magnitude of m.

If you make ##S_1=S_2=S##;
then, ##y_1=y_2=y##
and the equation gets simplified to be:

$$ y= \frac{mg}{k}$$

Because the shape of the vessel in our problem, we have certain mechanical advantage between both pistons.
The upper piston should slide at a slower rate than the lower piston.

Because of the above, ##y_1<y_2##
and our equation will need to have a reduced value in the denominator, which will be achieved with “a '-' in the denominator in the answer key.”
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K