Extra Credit Definite Integral - No Solution In Book- Did I do This right?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the definite integral \(\int^{1}_{-1} 2x\sqrt{(1-x^{2})^{3} +1} dx\). The original poster expresses uncertainty about their approach, which involved multiple substitutions and attempts to find an indefinite integral, despite recognizing the problem as a definite integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of the original poster's substitutions and algebraic manipulations. Some question the necessity of finding an indefinite integral when evaluating a definite integral, while others suggest that certain properties of the function may simplify the evaluation.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between odd functions and definite integrals, with some participants providing hints about evaluating the integral without finding the indefinite integral. The original poster is encouraged to consider the properties of the function rather than focusing solely on their algebraic approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster's method may not yield an elementary indefinite integral and mention the potential use of elliptic functions, which may be beyond the scope of the current discussion. The conversation reflects a mix of algebraic exploration and conceptual understanding of definite integrals.

Asphyxiated
Messages
263
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[tex]\int^{1}_{-1} 2x\sqrt{(1-x^{2})^{3} +1} dx[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



This is one of those questions in a math book that is almost never assigned and can be seen as "going above and beyond" what the chapter teaches you. I kind of improvised on the solution by substituting variables twice throughout the problem, so I am not sure if the solution is correct. I know that this is a definite integral but I only solved the indefinite portion of it, at least I think that I did. If I can get someone to give me the thumbs up on the indefinite solution I'll plug in the numbers for fun, but this is the part that counts right? ha, anyway:

Let:

[tex]u = 1-x^{2}[/tex]

[tex]du = -2x dx[/tex]

[tex]dx = -\frac{1}{2}x^{-1} du[/tex]

So now the problem is going to look like so:

[tex]\int^{1}_{-1} -\frac{1}{2} \frac{2x}{x} \sqrt{(u)^{3}+1}du[/tex]

and then:

[tex]\frac {2x}{x} = 2 \rightarrow -\frac{1}{2}(2) = -1[/tex]

so now its:

[tex]\int^{1}_{-1} - \sqrt{(u)^{3}+1} du[/tex]

or better yet:

[tex]\int^{1}_{-1} -((u)^{3}+1)^{1/2} du[/tex]

and now it gets to the part of where I am not sure if this is legal to do:

Let:

[tex]s = (u)^{3}+1[/tex]

[tex]ds =3u^{2} du[/tex]

[tex]du = \frac{1}{3}u^{-2} ds[/tex]

and since:

[tex]s = (u)^{3} +1 \rightarrow u = (s-1)^{1/3} = (s^{1/3}-1)[/tex]

so now the problem looks like:

[tex]\int^{1}_{-1} -\frac{1}{3}(s)^{1/3}(u)^{-2} ds[/tex]

which is the same as:

[tex]\int^{1}_{-1} -\frac{1}{3}(s)^{1/3}(s^{1/3}-1)^{-2} ds[/tex]

and then to get rid of the -2 exponent:

[tex]\int^{1}_{-1} -\frac{1}{3}(s)^{1/3}(s^{-2/3}-1) ds[/tex]

then distribute out the binomial:

[tex]\int^{1}_{-1} -\frac{1}{3}(s^{-1/3} - s^{1/2}) ds[/tex]

finally distribute the -1/3:

[tex]\int^{1}_{-1} -\frac{1}{3}s^{-1/3} + \frac{1}{3}s^{1/2} ds[/tex]

now let's take the anti-derivative of what we have:

[tex]-\frac{1}{2}(s)^{2/3}+\frac{2}{9}(s)^{3/2}[/tex]

and then substitute:

[tex]-\frac{1}{2}(u^{3}+1)^{2/3}+\frac{2}{9}(u^{3}+1)^{3/2}[/tex]

and once more:

[tex]-\frac{1}{2}((1-x^{2})^{3}+1)^{2/3}+\frac{2}{9}((1-x^{2})^{3}+1)^{3/2}[/tex]

then finally to complete the indefinite integral of the problem:

[tex]-\frac{1}{2}((1-x^{2})^{3}+1)^{2/3}+\frac{2}{9}((1-x^{2})^{3}+1)^{3/2} + C[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it's not right. (s-1)^(1/3) is not the same as (s^(1/3)-1), and then the algebra problems continue. You aren't going to able to find an indefinite integral for that without using elliptic functions. It's much simpler than that. You have a definite integral from x=(-1) to x=1. Any other thoughts?
 
I don't understand why you are saying that I have a definite integral that I don't have to find the indefinite integral for, isn't that the whole point? To solve a definite integral you need to find the indefinite integral (which is to say the anti-derivative) of the definite integral and then it is F(b)-F(a), right?
 
Yes, but there are some definite integrals you can evaluate without having an indefinite integral. Here's a big hint. If f(x) is odd, i.e. f(-x)=(-f(x)), what's the integral from -1 to 1 of f(x)?
 
Yes, but there are some definite integrals you can evaluate without having an indefinite integral. Here's a big hint. If f(x) is odd, i.e. -f(x)=f(-x), what's the integral from -1 to 1 of f(x).
 
Last edited:
Well, I am not sure of exactly what you mean, if you mean this:

[tex]\int^{1}_{-1} -x dx[/tex]

then the answer would be 0... is that what you getting at?
 
Yes. The integral of sin(x), x*exp(x^2), cos(x)*x, cos(x)*sin(x) etc from -1 to 1 is also 0. You don't have to find the indefinite integral to know that. Could your function be one of this group?
 
Right, well I typed the function into a graphing calculator to look at the graph and I know that the answer is 0 just from the way the graph looks, I was just interested in doing the math to find the indefinite integral, that's all. Let me ask you this, could the problem have been solved the way that I tried to solve it? I know that the algebra is bad in there, but saying that it is right, would it have worked out or is it just not possible to find the indefinite integral of this function using this method?
 
No, the indefinite integral is not an elementary function. Like I said, you can find one by using exotic functions like elliptic integrals, but that's out of your league. You did the right thing by graphing it. Now can you tell me how to figure out that it's zero without graphing it? What property of the function makes the integral zero?
 
  • #10
Well I think that the integral going from -1 to 1 makes it an odd function, and definite integrals of odd functions makes it = 0.
 
  • #11
You're approaching this from the wrong end. The limits of integration aren't what make a function odd or not: it's the function you're integrating that is either odd or it isn't. If the integrand is an odd function, then you can take advantage of the limits of integration to say something about the value of the definite integral.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K