Extremely easy math, but need expression

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joel DB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
Joel DB
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Okay,
This could be the easiest math question on here... but I'm going to ask the dumb question anyway. I have several coordinate points to solve for, and in each case I subtract the same amount from the previous "x" to get the next "x" value (X2...3...4...5...). The only point where I subract a different value is X1. The rest have a constant rate of change (derivative?). Example:

1.) X1 = (some vaule) – 30’
2.) X2 = (X1 – 60’), X3 = (X2 – 60’), X4 = (X3 – 60’), X5 = (X4 – 60’), X6 = (X5 – 60’)

There has to be a simple mathematical formula, other than this sloppy one. Any help would be great.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
like Mark44 said this is an arithmetic progression
Here the difference between two terms(of the sequence) is equal
Tn=a+(n-1)d
where a is the first term and d is the difference between two terms(d=T2-T1)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top