F = del(p.E) and F = (p.del)E are equivalent

  • Thread starter Thread starter izzy93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalent
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on demonstrating the equivalence of the expressions F = del(p.E) and F = (p.del)E in electrostatics. The user expands the second equation to show the components of force in relation to the electric field gradient. To prove the equivalence, it is suggested to utilize the vector differential operator equation, which incorporates the dot product and curl of the electric field. The curl of E is noted to be zero in electrostatic conditions, simplifying the proof. Understanding these relationships is crucial for grasping the fundamentals of electrostatic forces.
izzy93
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Question: In the electrostatic case, the expressions F = del(p.E) and F = (p.del)E are equivalent:

I am having trouble with how to show they are equivalent

In the second equation, I expanded it out to give F= px (dE/dx) + py (dE/dy) + pz(dE/dz)

Any help as to how to do this would be much appreciated

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to use the vector differential operator equation
\nabla({\bf p\cdot E)=p\times(\nabla\times E)+(p\cdot\nabla)E},
and curl E=0.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top