F(x) = x as a sum of periodic functions?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the question of whether the function f(x) = x can be expressed as a sum of periodic functions, specifically exploring the possibility of using two periodic functions or infinitely many periodic functions. The scope includes theoretical considerations and mathematical reasoning related to Fourier series and periodicity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about how f(x) = x could be represented as a sum of two periodic functions, questioning the feasibility of such an expression.
  • Others suggest that while expressing f(x) = x as a sum of infinitely many periodic functions is trivial, the challenge lies in using only two periodic functions.
  • A participant proposes that the reference might be to Fourier series, which involve an infinite sum of periodic functions, specifically sines and cosines.
  • One participant provides an example of a square wave expressed as an infinite series of sine functions, illustrating the concept of approximating non-periodic functions with periodic ones.
  • Another participant notes that the sum of periodic functions can yield a function that is not periodic, introducing the idea of "almost" periodic functions.
  • A question is raised about constructing sums of periodic functions that equal f(x) = x over specific intervals, prompting further exploration of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus on whether f(x) = x can be expressed as a sum of two periodic functions. Multiple competing views remain regarding the feasibility and methods of such representations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the concept of Fourier series and the challenges associated with approximating non-periodic functions, but there are unresolved assumptions about the definitions and properties of periodicity and "almost" periodic functions.

emyt
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
someone told me that there's a proof that says f(x) = x can be expressed as a sum of two periodic functions.. does anybody know this?

thanks for sharing
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
With what period? I cannot imagine how to do that!
 
HallsofIvy said:
With what period? I cannot imagine how to do that!

I'm not sure, someone just told me.. I don't really see how that would work, but who knows?
 
Last edited:
To express it as the sum of INFINITELY many periodic functions on some interval is trivial, however..

With two? Give me some more, please!
 
arildno said:
To express it as the sum of INFINITELY many periodic functions on some interval is trivial, however..

With two? Give me some more, please!

I'm not quite sure how a function as the sum of an infinite amount of periodic functions can be f(x) = x, could you explain please?

thank you
 
Last edited:
so I'm going to go ahead and take a guess that your friend was referring to a Fourier series.

as arildno has pointed out, this is a sum of an infinite number of periodic functions, not just two. (ie, it would be an infinite sum of sines, each with a different period and amplitude)

you can theoretically do the same with any periodic function, though Fourier was kind enough to show us how to calculate the coefficients and periods to describe any function we wish as just a sum of sines and cosines, so that is what is most often used.

there will be a lot of stuff on the internet that goes into detail on proving this, as well as showing you precisely what is going on...


also, so a function is periodic with an interval P if f(x)=f(x+P)
 
Fourier got a hard time from his contemporaries, who could not accept that a square wave may be expressed as the infinite sum of a set of sin functions. Nowadays we are shown at an early stage of our (electronic communications) studies that Fourier was right. You could do worse than consult a communications text in your attempt to come to grips with this non-intuitive notion.
For the sake of decency I include the details of an infinite series which describes a square wave:
sq(t)=sin(t) + (1/3)sin(3t) + (1/5)sin(5t) + (1/7)sin(7t) + ...
Try plotting this series, successively using more and more terms, and you will see the square wave taking shape as you go.
 
this is also a wonderful java applet that shows the effect quite well:
http://www.falstad.com/fourier/

i remember when i was first learning about Fourier series... took me a while to be comfortable with the idea of it all
 
arithmetix said:
Fourier got a hard time from his contemporaries, who could not accept that a square wave may be expressed as the infinite sum of a set of sin functions. Nowadays we are shown at an early stage of our (electronic communications) studies that Fourier was right. You could do worse than consult a communications text in your attempt to come to grips with this non-intuitive notion.
For the sake of decency I include the details of an infinite series which describes a square wave:
sq(t)=sin(t) + (1/3)sin(3t) + (1/5)sin(5t) + (1/7)sin(7t) + ...
Try plotting this series, successively using more and more terms, and you will see the square wave taking shape as you go.

thanks, I know nothing about Fourier series.. how does this relate to f(x) = x as a combination periodic functions?

from my own observations, I have seen that the sum of periodic functions can either be periodic or not quite periodic but "close enough". So, if you took enough of these periodic functions that created an "almost" periodic function ( I've heard this term actually defined, but I don't know the definition so I'm using it in a non-rigourous sense), you could get something that becomes not periodic at all. any thoughts on this? could you some how get f(x) = x in this way?
 
  • #10
Can you write down a sum of one or more periodic functions that equals f on the interval [-1,1]?
Now, can you add to that a sum of one or more periodic functions that equals f on the interval [-2,2]?
Now, can you add to that a sum of one or more periodic functions that equals f on the interval [-4,4]?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 139 ·
5
Replies
139
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K