Factorial Q: How to Get (n+1)!

  • Thread starter Thread starter askor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factorial
AI Thread Summary
To compute (n + 1)!, it can be expressed as (n + 1) * n!. This is derived from the definition of factorial, where (n + 1)! equals (n + 1) multiplied by the factorial of n, which is n!. The confusion arises from misinterpreting the factorial notation, but recognizing that (n + 1 - k) simplifies to n - k for k = 1, 2, 3, etc., clarifies the relationship. Therefore, the correct formulation is (n + 1)! = (n + 1) * n!. Understanding this relationship is essential for accurate factorial calculations.
askor
Messages
168
Reaction score
9
How do you get

(n + 1)! = (n + 1)(n)(n - 1)(n - 2) ... 3 ⋅ 2 ⋅ 1

?

Isn't (n + 1)! = (n + 1) ⋅ (n + 1 - 1) ⋅ (n + 1 - 2) ⋅ (n + 1 - 3) ⋅ (n + 1 - 4) ... and so on?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
askor said:
How do you get

(n + 1)! = (n + 1)(n)(n - 1)(n - 2) ... 3 ⋅ 2 ⋅ 1

?

Isn't (n + 1)! = (n + 1) ⋅ (n + 1 - 1) ⋅ (n + 1 - 2) ⋅ (n + 1 - 3) ⋅ (n + 1 - 4) ... and so on?
You need to realize that:
n+1-1 = n
n+1-2 = n-1
n+1-3 = n-2
etc
 
or more compactly:

(n+1)! = (n+1) * (n+1-1)! = (n+1) * n!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top