Factors Affecting Energy Gap in Aromatic Compounds

  • Thread starter Thread starter jkh4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phenol
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the pKa of phenol and factors affecting the energy gap in aromatic compounds. It clarifies that the isosbestic point is not influenced by pH or the equilibrium position but rather by the total concentration of protonated and deprotonated species. Changes in the HOMO-LUMO gap, influenced by substituents and conjugation, affect absorbance wavelengths, with electron-donating groups increasing and electron-withdrawing groups decreasing the wavelength. The impact of alkyl chains on absorption wavelengths is also questioned, highlighting their potential effects on the energy gap. Overall, understanding these factors is crucial for interpreting phenol's behavior in experiments.
jkh4
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
please help! questions on pKa of Phenol

Hi, I have some questions regarding the pKa of Phenol lab that I am working on right now.

1) What would cause the absorbance curves to not go through the isosbestic point?

For this one, I know that isosbestic point is not pH dependent so pH won't affect, and definitely true if there is a change in the total concentration of phenol or ratio of phenol to phenolate. But what about a change in the position of the equilibrium?

2) The wavelength of the transition depends on the exact energy difference between either π or n orbitals and the π* orbitals -- in other words, the HOMO-LUMO gap or the n-LUMO gap. When the energy gap becomes smaller, for example by increasing the size of the conjugated system, the absorbance wavelength increases. The question is what kind of factors affect this energy gap (HOMO-LUMO gap or the n-LUMO gap) for aromatic compounds.

3) Why was the rinsing of glassware with acetone not allowed in this experiment?

I know that acetone is UV active so it will give interences also acetone will dissolve the phenol, but will the acetone react with phenol?

Thank you so much for your help =)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the source of the absorbing moiety at the wavelength of the isosbestic point. You have already pointed out that it is not pH dependent. This absorbance is not dependent on the protonation or deprotonation of the phenol. Therefore, the equilibrium point, which only affects the relative concentrations of anion and parent compound, cannot affect isosbestic point.

Only the number of total equivalents of the protonated and deprotonated species will affect the absorptivity. Any change in total concentration of the sum of these two species, by any mechanism, will change the absorptivity at this point.

Can you posit any mechanism that might change the total concentration?
 
chemisttree said:
Consider the source of the absorbing moiety at the wavelength of the isosbestic point. You have already pointed out that it is not pH dependent. This absorbance is not dependent on the protonation or deprotonation of the phenol. Therefore, the equilibrium point, which only affects the relative concentrations of anion and parent compound, cannot affect isosbestic point.

Only the number of total equivalents of the protonated and deprotonated species will affect the absorptivity. Any change in total concentration of the sum of these two species, by any mechanism, will change the absorptivity at this point.

Can you posit any mechanism that might change the total concentration?

what about the ratio of phenol and phenoate? is that mean the ratio of concentration?
 
By definition, the isosbestic point is only dependent on the SUM of the concentrations of the protonated and deprotonated species, not the individual concentrations.
 
Homo Lumo

I also have the same question about HOMO and LUMO gap. I know that adding a electron donating substituent and adding a double bond which is conjugated will increase the wavelength of absorption and adding electron withdrawing substituents will decrease the wavelength of absorption.

But what about adding alkyl chains, will it decrease or increase the wavelength of absorption??

thanks!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top