Fahrenheit 451 and activation energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter NeilWallace
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Activation Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the temperature at which paper ignites, noted as 451°F in the context of "Fahrenheit 451." Participants debate the accuracy of this figure, suggesting it is too low for paper combustion, which typically occurs between 424°F and 474°F. The Arrhenius equation is mentioned as a tool for predicting reaction temperatures, but there is confusion about the necessary input values for specific reactions, such as methane and oxygen. Experimental data is emphasized as crucial for determining accurate activation energy values. Overall, the conversation highlights discrepancies in combustion temperature references and the importance of empirical data in chemical reactions.
NeilWallace
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I know from the movie that paper burns at fahrenheit 451. I guess this refers to the activation energy paper and oxygen require to react into CO2 and water.

I have been trying to understand the Arrhenius equation which I think is the key to predicting at what temperature a reaction will take place but I don't understand what numbers you plug into predict the temperature say methane and oxygen will react CH4 and O2 can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
451 deg F is well too low to start paper burning. Not that it matters much.

Numbers you need are determined experimentally, you may be able to find them in handbooks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
451 °C = 844 °F

I am not saying someone made a NASA style mistake, but numbers are suggestive.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the 3 body problem unsolvable? And what will happen if someone solves it?'

I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
View full post »

Similar threads

Gibbs free energy of activation and activation energy
Replies
4
Views
3K
PEM electrolyzer - How does platinum reduce activation energy?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Do Different Temperatures Affect Enzyme Activity in a Parabolic Arrhenius Plot?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Automotive Loss of gaseous volume because of fuel combustion
Replies
2
Views
1K
Do Spontaneous Reactions actually need activation energy?
Replies
14
Views
4K
Can O2 combine with H2 to form water without activation energy?
Replies
5
Views
7K
Synhelion -- Using solar heliostat farms to create liquid fuels from Water Vapor and CO2
Replies
7
Views
2K
Activation energy of parallel reaction
Replies
2
Views
3K
How Can I Store Methane Produced from CO2 and Water Without Combustion?
Replies
23
Views
3K
What is Plasmonic Photocatalysis and How Can It Help Remove Hydrogen Sulfide?
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top