Failed rocket problem (momentum conservation, Kleppner 4-4)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to momentum conservation in the context of a rocket's trajectory. Participants are examining the implications of the rocket's movement and the assumptions made in the problem statement.

Discussion Character

  • Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the validity of assuming a parabolic trajectory for the center of mass and question the implications of powered flight on the horizontal distance traveled after the rocket's peak. There is discussion about the potential outcomes of the rocket's movement and the effects of an explosion on its trajectory.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the assumptions necessary for solving the problem. Some suggest that without assuming a quick burnout of the rocket, the trajectory cannot be determined, while others acknowledge the complexity introduced by the powered flight phase.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem's setup may lack clarity regarding the rocket's behavior during powered flight and the conditions surrounding the explosion, which are critical to understanding the trajectory.

Michael Korobov
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
An instrument-carrying rocket accidentally explodes at the top of its trajectory. The horizontal distance between the launch point and the point of explosion is L. The rocket breaks into two pieces that fly apart horizontally. The larger piece has three times the mass of the smaller piece. To the surprise of the scientist in charge, the smaller piece returns to Earth at the launching station. How far away does the larger piece land? Neglect air resistance and effects due to the Earth’s curvature.
Relevant Equations
Momentum conserved
Kinematics equations
Hi,
Can anyone hint me if there is issue in the problem statement?
Consistent answer can be obtained if one presumes that the trajectory of center mass is parabolic.
Assuming this, the CM will land at distance L right to the axis of symmetry of parabola.
But the problem tells about a rocket, therefore first part of rocket movement is not free fall and thus the horizontal distance of falling after the top of trajectory is not necessarily L.
Is it deduction correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Michael Korobov said:
But the problem tells about a rocket, therefore first part of rocket movement is not free fall and thus the horizontal distance of falling after the top of trajectory is not necessarily L.
Is it deduction correct?
Yes, it is not necessarily L. That's why the scientist in charge was surprised when it landed there.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Michael Korobov
Michael Korobov said:
But the problem tells about a rocket, therefore first part of rocket movement is not free fall and thus the horizontal distance of falling after the top of trajectory is not necessarily L.
Is it deduction correct?
If we assume powered flight all the way to the top of the trajectory then we have, in principle, no way to know the horizontal velocity of the rocket just prior to the explosion.

It is possible, for instance, that the rocket reverses course, that the "explosion" is a mere fizzle and that both rocket pieces land together at the launch site.

Accordingly, one assumes, as you did in your solution, that the rocket burns out almost immediately after launch and then carries on in a parabolic free fall trajectory. Otherwise, there is no way to a solution.
 
jbriggs444 said:
If we assume powered flight all the way to the top of the trajectory then we have, in principle, no way to know the horizontal velocity of the rocket just prior to the explosion.

It is possible, for instance, that the rocket reverses course, that the "explosion" is a mere fizzle and that both rocket pieces land together at the launch site.

Accordingly, one assumes, as you did in your solution, that the rocket burns out almost immediately after launch and then carries on in a parabolic free fall trajectory. Otherwise, there is no way to a solution.
Indeed, this was the only way to get consistent solution.
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
16K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K