Falling object (gravity + kinematics)

AI Thread Summary
An object dropped from one Earth radius above the surface experiences varying gravitational acceleration as it falls. The initial attempt to calculate the final speed used constant acceleration, leading to an incorrect result. The correct approach involves using energy conservation principles instead of kinematics, as gravitational potential energy varies with distance from the Earth. The final speed just before impact is derived from the gravitational potential energy equation, yielding the correct result of v = √(GM/R). This highlights the importance of recognizing non-constant forces in physics problems.
mbrmbrg
Messages
485
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



An object is dropped from an altitude of one Earth radius above Earth's surface. If M is the mass of Earth and R is its radus, find the speed of the object just before it hits Earth.

Homework Equations



F_g=ma_g=\frac{GMm}{r^2}

v^2=v_0^2+2ah

The Attempt at a Solution



F_g=\frac{GMm}{(2R)^2}=ma_g

a_g=\frac{GM}{4R^2}

Now, plug that into the kintematics equation and get

v^2=0+2(\frac{GM}{4R^2})R

v=\sqrt{\frac{GM}{2R}}

But the correct answer is given as \sqrt{\frac{GM}{R}}, and I can't find my error.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mbrmbrg said:
F_g=ma_g=\frac{GMm}{r^2}
Note that F_g and a_g are not constant, but are functions of r.
v^2=v_0^2+2ah
But this kinematic equation assumes constant acceleration.

The Attempt at a Solution



F_g=\frac{GMm}{(2R)^2}=ma_g

a_g=\frac{GM}{4R^2}
That's only the acceleration at the point r = 2R; as the object falls, the acceleration increases.

Your error is treating this as a constant acceleration problem. Instead of using kinematics, why not use energy conservation? (What's the general form for gravitational PE? Note that "mgh" is only valid near the Earth's surface--no good here.)
 
Thanks, got it now!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top