Family of subset of N is countable?

  • Thread starter Unassuming
  • Start date
  • #1
169
0

Homework Statement


I am trying to show that a family F {A[tex]\subseteq[/tex][tex]N[/tex]: A is finite} Show that F is countable.

I found a proof in a book but I don't understand it. Could you help me please?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



If A is finite, then F is clearly also finite and the claim becomes trivially true. We therefore suppose that A is countable infinite.

To prove that F is countable it would be sufficient to show that the family of all finite subsets of "Naturals" is countable. For each n an element of "Naturals", let Mn denote the family of all subsets N of "Naturals" satisfying N[tex]\subseteq[/tex] {1,2,...,n}.
Mn is obviously finite.

If M is the family of all finite subsets of "Naturals", we see that it can be expressed as M= the union of all Mn from n=1 to infinity. From the theorem that "union of countable sets is countable" we see though that M is countable and hence see that the family F is also countable.

---
My first question is as follows. In the beginning, how do they know that if A is finite, then F is clearly also finite?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
619
If A is finite and the number of elements in A is n. Then the number of subsets of A is 2^n. You can prove this be induction. But it's pretty obvious if you think about how to choose a subset. For each element a of A you can either have a in the subset or a not in the subset.
 
  • #3
169
0
Thanks Dick,

but why, if the problem states that A is finite, must they prove the case in which A is countable infinite?
 
  • #4
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
619
The problem doesn't state A is finite. It wants you to prove that the infinite set N has a countable number of finite subsets. 'A' is just a dummy variable in the set notation. In the proof M_n are the sets that are finite.
 
  • #5
169
0
Thanks again Dick,

Why is it that F is stated as the family of all subsets A, but the proof uses M? Could they have used F without loss?
 
  • #6
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,263
619
I don't know why they switched from F to M in the proof. They are both the set of all finite subsets of N.
 

Related Threads on Family of subset of N is countable?

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
Z
Replies
5
Views
950
Top