Faraday's law on rotating disk

AI Thread Summary
A rotating metal disk in a constant magnetic field induces voltage differences due to Faraday's law, which relates changing magnetic flux to electromotive force (emf). The challenge lies in understanding how the magnetic flux changes, as the magnetic field is constant and the disk's rotation does not alter it. The discussion suggests conceptualizing the disk as composed of multiple radial strips of copper, each generating emf, and emphasizes that these strips are connected in parallel, resulting in uniform voltage across them. The presence of insulating material between the strips is justified by the absence of current flow between points. This approach clarifies the application of Faraday's law in this scenario.
gralla55
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

A metal disk is rotating with constant angular velocity in a constant magnetic field perpendicular to it. Use Faraday's law to fint the the induced voltage difference between the two points on the wire.


The attempt at a solution

So to use Faraday's Law, I need to first find an expression for the change in magnetic flux per unit of time inside a closed loop. However, from the drawing I can't find any loop where the magnetic field changes. The wire is connected to the disk with brushes, so I'm assuming that it doesn't rotate with the disk. Though, even if it did the magnetic field would still not penetrate it's interior.
 

Attachments

  • ex10.jpg
    ex10.jpg
    41.3 KB · Views: 544
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at the line marked R. It is sweeping out an area in the magnetic field.
 
Sure, but the magnetic field is constant, so how is the flux through that area changing with time?
 
Check Classical physics, page2 , post by HAMJOOP...faraday paradox.
There is a minor mistake in post #10 but I think this thread will help.
 
Last edited:
One way to handle this problem is to think of the disc as comprising many radial strips of copper separated by very thin insulating material. Now compute the emf generated by one of those strips.

Then realize that all the strips are connected in parallel so the emf is the same as if there were only one strip.

Now you have to justify the presence of the insulating strips. Hint: if there is no current from one point to another, is it OK to put an insulator between those points?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top