Faster than Light Travel Question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of faster-than-light travel, specifically addressing the theoretical limitations of spacecraft propulsion systems and the implications of approaching the speed of light. Participants explore the physics behind acceleration, time dilation, and the energy requirements for reaching light speed.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions what prevents a spacecraft from reaching or exceeding the speed of light if a constant force is applied, suggesting potential time distortion effects for the crew.
  • Another participant cites Einstein's theory, stating that no object with mass can reach light speed, and mentions the photon as a massless particle that travels at this speed. They also note that time dilation occurs at high velocities, causing clocks on a fast-moving spacecraft to tick slower compared to those on Earth.
  • A different participant provides a formula for calculating velocity under constant acceleration, explaining that while initial approximations suggest exceeding light speed is possible, the correct relativistic formula indicates that reaching the speed of light is unattainable regardless of acceleration or duration.
  • Another response reiterates the energy requirements for approaching light speed, stating that as velocity increases, the energy needed for further acceleration becomes infinite, implying that it is impossible to reach or exceed light speed due to energy constraints.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of faster-than-light travel and the implications of relativistic physics. No consensus is reached regarding the potential for exceeding light speed or the interpretation of energy requirements.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include assumptions about propulsion systems and fuel availability, as well as the limitations of classical versus relativistic physics in explaining high-velocity scenarios.

masonroese
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Assuming a spacecraft had a propulsion system and sufficient fuel, what stops it from reaching the speed of light and beyond if a constant force is always being exerted on it?

And in the event that it can go beyond the speed of light, will time distortion take place, and the crew on board the ship will live for thousands of years?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two things. According to Einstein no object with mass can reach the speed of light. The elementary particle photon which is responsible for the electromagnetic spectrum moves at the speed of light and have no mass. Researchers might have disproved Einstein's hypothesis but that has not been confirmed! (Check the hadron collider in CERN for more info) Time will get distorted and depends on which rate of velocity you're moving. If you were in a space shuttle moving near c your clock will tick slower than the clock will tick on Earth. I think you might can put it like this, but I am not sure:
Sufficient high velocity = Time will go by slower.

//WeW
 
Here's my answer to someone else's similar question:

ghwellsjr said:
With low velocities, the formula for calculating the velocity, v, after an acceleration, a, for a time, t, is:
[tex]v = a t[/tex]
So this says you could apply any acceleration for a long enough time and get v to exceed c. Or if you had a high enough acceleration, for a shorter time, it says you could get v to exceed c.

But this formula is only an approximation where the velocities end up being very small compared to c.

The correct formula is:
[tex]v = \frac{a t}{\sqrt{1+(a t/c)^2}}[/tex]

If you look carefully at this formula you will see that when [tex]a t[/tex] is very small, the formula approximates to:
[tex]v < \frac{a t}{\sqrt{1}}[/tex]
[tex]v < a t[/tex]
This is similar to the original formula.

But when [tex]a t[/tex] is very large, the formula approximates to:
[tex]v < \frac{a t}{\sqrt{(a t/c)^2}}[/tex]
[tex]v < \frac{a t}{(a t/c)}[/tex]
[tex]v < \frac{1}{(1/c)}[/tex]
[tex]v < c[/tex]
So in reality, no matter how much you accelerate, or how long you accelerate, you can never reach c.
 
masonroese said:
Assuming a spacecraft had a propulsion system and sufficient fuel, what stops it from reaching the speed of light and beyond if a constant force is always being exerted on it?

The answer that seems to satisfy most people is this:
As your velocity approaches the speed of light the proportional amount of energy required to accelerate further gets higher. The speed of light is the speed at which it an infinite amount of energy is required to accelerate any further. (Strictly speaking, its an asymptotic approach.)

So, the problem is really in your question:
masonroese said:
Assuming a spacecraft had a propulsion system and sufficient fuel, what stops it from reaching the speed of light and beyond if a constant force is always being exerted on it?

There's not enough fuel in the universe to get there. You would just get closer and closer and closer until you had exhausted all the matter and energy in the universe.

"Assuming you had a perfect sphere, what prevents it from being a cube?"
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
723
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K